The TCE Blog
Trichloroethylene is everywhere. It causes cancer and other serious health problems. People deserve better protection.

HOME ABOUT ARCHIVES CONTACT

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Disney faces multiple lawsuits for contamination in Burbank (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, June 17, 2009 [Permalink] [0 Comments]

View Larger Map

The Walt Disney Co. has been sued by several groups of plaintiffs for dumping wastewater and contaminating Polliwog Park and the surrounding area with Chromium 6, TCE, and PCE.
As their attorneys shuffle between four similar lawsuits that allege the Walt Disney Co. has for decades contaminated groundwater with cancer-causing chromium 6 and other toxic chemicals, stories of ill health from the plaintiffs are beginning to emerge.

In the latest lawsuit, filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court by the Sacramento-based firm Kershaw Cutter & Ratinoff LLP on behalf of 16 people with strong ties to the Rancho District, the plaintiffs claim Disney dumped wastewater contaminated with hexavalent chromium from its on-site cooling systems down the centerline of Parkside Avenue, toward Parish Place and across Riverside Drive into the so-called Polliwog, an 11-acre parcel near the studio’s Imagineering facilities.

“The water, without warning, would rush down like a flood,” said resident Bob Bell, who in 1945 paid $25,000 for his home at the corner of Parkside Avenue. “Water hopped the curb and flooded the streets for hours on end.”
The contamination was recently brought to light by Environmental World Watch, a party to one of the lawsuits. EWW claims that Disney has dumped air cooling water and the chemicals into curbside drains every day for the past 21 years.

Plaintiffs are seeking compensation for property damage caused by the contamination. No word yet whether any personal injury claims have been filed.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Prostate cancer at Rocketdyne linked to TCE exposure (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
A UCLA study recently linked increased physical activity at work with a decreased chance of developing prostate cancer. In addition, it linked exposure to TCE (amongst a handful of other chemicals) with increased rates of prostate cancer. According to UCLA's Johnson Cancer Center:
Researchers studied more than 2,100 men who worked at the Rocketdyne facility in the San Fernando Valley, many of whom were exposed to radiation and chemicals that may have increased their risk for certain cancers. The research team identified 362 men who developed prostate cancer and compared them to 1,805 men of similar age and socioeconomic status who did not get prostate cancer.

The study, done in conjunction with researchers at the Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute and the University of Michigan, appears in the February issue of the journal Cancer Causes Control.

"The message from this study for today is that if you're more active, you may be able to prevent this cancer from happening," said Beate Ritz, a Jonsson Cancer Center researcher, an associate professor of epidemiology in the UCLA School of Public Health and the study's senior author. "If you have a desk job, do something physically active to counterbalance it."

[...]

The study found that the men who developed prostate cancer were less likely to hold the more physically active jobs. Those that got cancer also were more likely than the control group to be highly exposed to the chemicals that were evaluated, including hydrazine, benzene, mineral oil, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and trichloroethylene (TCE), which are known or suspected carcinogens.
Though the focus on physical activity appears to be the main thrust of this research, we think the TCE-related finding is worth highlighting.

Read the news about the study here. For the study itself ("Nested case–control study of occupational physical activity and prostate cancer among workers using a job exposure matrix"), see here.

Sunday, February 3, 2008

Lawmakers want EPA probed for TCE 'inaction' (MD, CA, DC)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, February 3, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Representatives Al Wynn (D-MD), the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials, and Hilda Solis (D-CA), the Vice Chair of the Subcommittee, are calling for a probe into a number of issues that affect American's water and health. In a letter to the General Accounting Office (GAO), the lawmakers asked GAO to investigate bottled water, TCE, and the EPA's rule-setting for other contaminants.

You can read more about the full range of investigation requests in the official press release. Here, we are focused on the TCE-specific portion:
Wynn and Solis are also asking the Government Accountability Office to examine EPA’s failure to update its current drinking water standard for Trichloroethylene (TCE). An EPA 2001 assessment found TCE was far more likely to cause cancer than previously believed. Despite this assessment and a recommendation from the National Academy of Science, EPA has failed to update its national drinking water standard for TCE.

“The evidence of the dangers of TCE keep piling up and the EPA keeps failing to act,” Wynn added. “Hopefully, GAO can shed some much needed light on the reasons for EPA’s inaction.”

The EPA’s current drinking water standard for TCE allows a maximum of 5 parts per billion, but some have called for a revision of that standard to reduce the maximum amount of TCE allowed in water.
From the text of the letter sent to GAO [PDF], we learn even more:
[We] request that GAO review the EPA’s failure to update it current drinking water standard for Trichloroethylene (TCE) following its August 2001 draft risk assessment entitled “Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment: Synthesis and Characterization.” The EPA 2001 assessment found that TCE was far more likely to cause cancer than EPA had previously believed. We note that in July 2006, the National Academy of Science (NAS) found “that the evidence on carcinogenic risk and other health hazards from exposure to trichloroethylene has strengthened since 2001” and recommended “that federal agencies finalize their risk assessment with currently available data so that risk management decisions can be made expeditiously.” EPA does not appear, however, to have acted consistently with respect to the findings and recommendations of these major scientific studies to protect the public health.

In conducting your review of the regulatory review process, and associated issues specific to TCE, please examine the following issues:
  1. The extent to which EPA’s efforts to revise the TCE drinking water standard complies with the Safe Drinking Water Act’s requirements, and facilitate improvements to public health protection.

  2. The obstacles, if any, that have interfered with EPA’s ability to expeditiously revise its standards for TCE.

  3. The latest research and what it suggests about TCE’s effects on human health and the environment, including information from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s study related to Camp Lejeune.

  4. The number of Department of Defense sites contaminated with TCE and the Department’s role, if any, in delaying or interfering with EPA efforts to update a drinking water standard for TCE.
Of course, we already know part of the publicly-accepted answer to #4: There are 1,400 military sites contaminated with TCE. We have reason to believe the actual number may be higher - more on this, and DOD's interference, another time.

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

TCE in Chico (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, January 23, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
There's a decades-old plume of TCE and PCE in Chico, CA that migrated nearly two-miles from its source and has contaminated residents' well water for years:
The Skyway plume was discovered when area residents asked for wells to be tested because they were concerned a nearby tank farm might be leaking petroleum-based contaminants into their groundwater. Instead, unacceptable levels of chlorinated solvents were found and traced back to an operation that manufactured aluminum shower enclosures on Speedway Avenue from 1962 until 1976.

Preliminary tests revealed the contamination extends about two miles from its origin, flowing under Skyway and Cessna avenues and ending along Hegan Avenue near the Chico State University farm. [see map]
Just this week, ABB, the company being "held responsible for clean-up costs," agreed to pay for 63 residential hook-ups to the water system run by California Water Service Company (a.k.a. Cal Water). Meanwhile, the investigation into the overall size of the plume continues.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

New TCE detected in Runkle Canyon near Rocketdyne/Santa Susana Field Laboratory (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Saturday, January 19, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Investigative journalist Michael Collins alerted us to this news about newly disclosed TCE detects in Runkle Canyon near where KB Homes has plans to build:
KB Homes had hoped to build 461 residences in the 1,595-acre canyon, but those plans have been delayed since the summer of 2006 when Southwick and a cadre of residents who call themselves the "Radiation Rangers" (See: "Dirty Business," Nov. 1, 2007) questioned the safety of the project.

[…]

The Reporter has obtained a December 2007 study of offsite pollution around SSFL prepared by an Arcadia-based environmental engineering firm MWH for Boeing, NASA and the Department of Energy which shows that TCE has been detected in approximately 10 percent of several dozen groundwater samples collected on Runkle Canyon property.

[…]

Around 1.73 million gallons of TCE were used at [Santa Susana Field Laboratory] as a solvent to hose down rocket engines, as the Reporter first revealed during its investigation of the Runkle Canyon-adjacent Ahmanson Ranch development. That project tanked over toxic troubles in 2003 before becoming state park land (See: "Air Apparent," Feb.13, 2003). Approximately 530,000 gallons of the carcinogen, which is a volatile organic compound, have seeped into the area's groundwater. With the current rate of remediating TCE being less than 10 gallons a year at SSFL, it will take more than 50,000 years to clean up.
Read more in Down the Test Tubes at the Ventura County Reporter (CA). For additional documents that Michael uncovered and ongoing developments in the Runkle Canyon story, see his investigative environmental news website at EnviroReporter.com.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

New blog: Corps should warn former MCAS El Toro Marines of potential toxic exposure (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, January 17, 2008 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In a recently launched blog, Robert J.O'Dowd is calling on the Marine Corps to warn all those stationed at MCAS El Toro that they may have been exposed to toxic levels of TCE and PCE while stationed at the base:
The Marine Corps takes great pride “in taking care of its own.” Marines who were attached to Marine Wing Support Group 37 at former MCAS El Toro are at risk for potential exposure to toxic chemicals as a result of the contamination of the soil and groundwater. These Marines may have been exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE), suffered serious health consequences, and have no idea of what hit them.

[...]

Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) El Toro was officially closed in 1999. Prior to its closure, El Toro was the subject of a massive environmental clean-up by the Navy. The first indication of chemical contamination came from a routine inspection off the base in1985 when civilian workers discovered trichloroethylene (TCE) in the groundwater. Before its closure, some 25 contaminated sites were found at El Toro. Site 24, the MWSG 37 was one of the most toxic sites and the source of the TCE toxic plume spreading several miles off the base. It took a number of years before the source of the toxic chemicals was known. Most Navy and Marines veterans not living in southern California who were stationed at El Toro have no knowledge of the toxic chemicals found on the base, its eventually closure in 1999, and sale at a public auction in 2005. Some of these veterans were exposed to these toxins and likely became seriously ill.

[...]

The Marine Corps can remedy this situation without incurring great costs by: (1) establish a link on the existing 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing website (http://www.3maw.usmc.mil/) to register and inform all MWSG-37 Marines stationed at El Toro of the potential exposure to contaminated soil and groundwater; (2) request the various Veteran Service Organizations to alert their memberships of the contamination associated with former MCAS El Toro; and (3) and use Public Service announcements to alert Marines who do not have access to the internet.
Be sure to check out more of the MCAS El Toro history at Robert's blog.

For our previous coverage of contamination concerns at El Toro (some of which came from the mysteriously-no-longer-active Tox News website), see here.

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Senators Clinton, Dole, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Kerry propose TCE legislation (D.C.)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, August 2, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Big day in the TCE world today, marked by 1 word: LEGISLATION.

Okay, maybe two words: PROPOSED LEGISLATION

Today, Senators Clinton, Dole, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Kerry introduced a bill that proposes to:
Amend the Safe Water Drinking Act to protect the health of susceptible populations, including pregnant women, infants, and children, by requiring a health advisory, drinking water standard, and reference concentration for trichloroethylene vapor intrusion, and for other purposes.
Cited formally as the "Toxic Chemical Exposure Reduction Act of 2007" (get it? "TCE Reduction Act"?) the Senators have proposed that EPA revise the national standard for allowable TCE levels in public drinking water, create a national standard for allowable TCE in indoor air, and enforce nationwide monitoring and cleanups based on these new standards. All of this is proposed to occur within the 3-18 months of the bill's enactment.

Since the details of the bill are interesting and worth comment, we'll post them here shortly. For now, we'll say this: We think this bill, if passed and enforced, could go a long way towards better protecting the public from TCE.

Of course, if the EPA chooses to or is forced to play politics, we also envision ways that they could still stagnate change even if the bill is passed…

As we said, more to come from us on this. Meantime, you can download the full bill here.

Lastly, we are in the process of contacting Senators from our home state, Connecticut, to ask for their support for this legislation. We strongly urge readers to contact their state Senators as well.

(If any readers do contact their Senators for support, please consider letting us know the kind of feedback you receive. If we’re able to keep track of whom has pledged their support, we’ll keep readers posted by running updates on this blog. What could possibly be more exciting?)

UPDATE: For the official press release from Senator Clinton announcing the proposed legislation, see here.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Hall and Hinchey introduce companion to Senate's TCE legislation (NY)
  2. A peek inside the Toxic Chemical Exposure Reduction Act
  3. Senators Clinton, Dole, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Kerry propose TCE legislation (D.C.)

Friday, June 29, 2007

News Round-up
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 29, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Each of these stories deserves its own post and and, almost certainly, some commentary. Until we get more time for this, please be sure to check them out directly via the links below. All of them come courtesy of the Google. (Sorry to do it this way, we'll try to get the full versions up soon. That reminds us, we're still looking for local correspondents).

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Lodi contamination settlement near end; cleanup moves ahead (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, June 28, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
From two Friday's ago, the Lodi News-Sentinel (CA) ran this story:
As litigation from Lodi's groundwater contamination case comes to a close, cleanup has already begun.

News-Sentinel reporter Matt Brown recently discussed the status of the remaining litigation and the cleanup with City Attorney Stephen Schwabauer.

In 1989, officials discovered that the groundwater in some areas of Downtown was contaminated with the chemicals PCE and TCE, which are used as industrial solvents and in dry cleaning. The chemicals spread out to five different plumes in the city's groundwater.

In the mid-1990s, the city's outside attorney, Michael Donovan, crafted a plan to sue insurance companies of local businesses, including the News-Sentinel, for their role in the contamination. After a number of negative court rulings, the City Council in 2004 fired Donovan and City Attorney Randy Hays.

The city has since sued Donovan for fraud and malpractice, and Donovan has countersued, claiming the city owes him millions in legal fees.

The city has sought to settle out of court with the parties responsible for the contamination.
Read the interview here.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Aerojet pollution in Rancho Cordova: Treat tainted water vs. take wells off-line? (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, June 17, 2007 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Sacramento Bee (CA) reports:
State health officials are considering a proposal that would have Rancho Cordova residents relying for the first time on treatment technologies to remove rocket fuel chemicals from their drinking water.

The proposed change in contaminant cleanup strategy comes as concentrations of chemicals are creeping up in several Rancho Cordova drinking-water wells.

The fixes, however, are expected to be completed before the contamination reaches unsafe levels, utility and state officials said.

[...]

The contaminants are perchlorate, an oxidizing component of solid rocket propellant known to cause thyroid disorders and NDMA -- n-nitro-sodimethylamine -- a "probable" cancer-causing combustion product of liquid rocket fuel, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

The chemicals are linked to historic disposal practices at Aerojet. In the 1950s through 1970s, the defense contractor disposed of residual rocket fuel and metal-cleaning solvents in unlined open pits, allowing the wastes to seep through the soil and into the groundwater tapped for Rancho Cordova homes.

The most pervasive Aerojet pollutant is trichloroethylene (TCE), an industrial solvent that has been linked to brain damage, liver cancer, skin diseases and immune disorders.
Read the full story.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Aerojet pollution in Rancho Cordova: Treat tainted water vs. take wells off-line? (CA)
  2. Map of Aerojet contamination plume
  3. Guilty, facing punitive damages, Aerojet settles personal injury lawsuits (CA)

Sunday, October 8, 2006

Independent report: Radiation from Rocketdyne likely caused cancers (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, October 8, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The folks near Rocketdyne apparently have way more to be concerned with than just TCE or perchlorate contamination. According to this front-page story from Friday's Los Angeles Times:
Radioactive emissions from a 1959 nuclear accident at a research lab near Simi Valley appear to have been much greater than previously suspected and could have resulted in hundreds of cancers in surrounding communities, according to a study released Thursday.

Chemical contamination from rocket engine testing at the site continues to threaten soil and groundwater in the area around Rocketdyne's Santa Susana Field Laboratory, the study also found.

The nuclear meltdown, which remained virtually unknown to the public until 1979, could have caused between 260 and 1,800 cases of cancer "over a period of many decades," the study concluded.

But the advisory panel that oversaw the five-year study, conducted by an independent team of scientists and health experts, said it could not offer more specifics about potential exposure to carcinogens because the Department of Energy and Rocketdyne's owner, Boeing Co., did not provide key information.

"This lack of candor … makes characterization of the potential health impacts of past accidents and releases extremely difficult," the panel concluded.
AP Reports also add:
The lab's former owner, Rocketdyne, has said for years that no significant radiation was released. But the independent advisory panel said the incident released nearly 459 times more radiation than a similar one at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island in 1979.

[...]

The Energy Department, Boeing [the site's current owner] and the state have been involved in efforts to decontaminate the site. The state has estimated that more than 1.73 million gallons of toxic trichloroethylene was dumped on the grounds and that 500,000 gallons have saturated the bedrock beneath the lab.

The panel concluded local soil and groundwater also may have been contaminated. The rocket fuel additive perchlorate has been found in a well, but Boeing has disputed assertions it came from the lab. Long-term exposure to high levels of perchlorate can cause thyroid problems.
Read the full LA Times article, Study Says Lab Meltdown Caused Cancer. Or check out AP's report here.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Norco blasted for Wyle efforts (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, September 24, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Press-Enterprise (Riverside, CA) reported:
Members of the city's community group on Wyle Labs lashed out at city and school officials Thursday night for not doing more to inform the public about pollution from the testing facility.

The Wyle Community Advisory Group called on Norco officials to honor a 2-year-old commitment to the Riverside County grand jury to monitor clean-up efforts at Wyle Labs and communicate with residents about it.

"It's the city's job to protect the public," group Chairwoman Celeste Tittle said.

Representatives from the school district and the city have not attended an advisory group meeting for more than a year, she said.

City and school officials could not be reached for comment Thursday night.

People who contact the city for information about Wyle are told that it's not a problem or that they can't review regulatory reports, Tittle said.

"I don't believe the school (district) has been active in getting out the information as they would like us to believe," Tittle said.
Read the full story here.

Tuesday, August 8, 2006

You are invited: "High Tech Trash" in San Francisco & a chance to be on TV (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, August 8, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Recently received a nice note from Lizzie Grossman, author of High Tech Trash: Digital Devices, Hidden Toxics, and Human Health. She sent the following invitation for TCE Blog readers:
What: A reading and discussion of "High Tech Trash: Digital Devices, Hidden Toxics, and Human Health," my new book about the environmental and health impacts of the entire life-cycle of high tech electronics, just out from Island Press. (see http://www.islandpress.org)

C-Span Book TV will be coming to film, so here's your chance to reach an audience of thousands when you ask that important question! Seriously, this is a great opportunity to help promote understanding of these issues, so come prepared to have a lively conversation.

Where & When: August 15, 7 pm, at Book Passage in San Francisco, in the Ferry Building on the Embarcadero — (415) 835-1020 for directions

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. You are invited: "High Tech Trash" in San Francisco & a chance to be on TV (CA)
  2. High Tech Trash on CNET; Lizzie Grossman interviewed
  3. High Tech Trash: Digital Devices, Hidden Toxics and Human Health

Thursday, July 27, 2006

LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, July 27, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Los Angeles Times' Ralph Vartabedian, author of an important series of articles on the politics and health impact of trichloroethylene (TCE), got his hands on an advanced copy of the National Academies' TCE health risks report (slated for official release later today). He writes:
After a detailed study of the most widespread industrial contaminant in U.S. drinking water, the National Research Council will report today that evidence is growing stronger that the chemical causes cancer and other human health problems.

The 379-page report clears a path for federal regulators to formally raise the risk assessment of trichloroethylene, known as TCE, a step that has been tied up by infighting between scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency and the Defense Department.
If you recall, in 2001, EPA's Draft Health Risk Assessment for Trichloroethylene found TCE to be more toxic than previously thought and characterized TCE as "highly likely to produce cancer in humans". According to the Department of Defense, these findings were to be the basis for more stringent clean-up standards at thousands of TCE-contaminated sites across the country and were likely to cost billions of dollars for DOD, the world's largest and most powerful TCE polluter.
The EPA attempted to issue a risk assessment in 2001 that found TCE to be two to 40 times more carcinogenic than previously thought, but that action was opposed by the Defense Department, the Energy Department and NASA. The Pentagon has 1,400 properties contaminated with TCE.

The Bush administration sent the matter to the National Research Council for study, based on military assertions that the EPA had overblown the risks. But the new report does not support that criticism.

"The committee found that the evidence on carcinogenic risk and other health hazards from exposure to trichloroethylene has strengthened since 2001," the report said.

The report urged federal agencies to complete their assessment of TCE risks as soon as possible "with currently available data," meaning they should not wait for additional basic research, as suggested by the Defense Department.
Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) was part of the congressional briefing on Wednesday where the NAS presented their findings. In Hinchey's district, where widespread TCE contamination has impacted the air inside people's homes, a health study found that rates of kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and birth defects were elevated with statistical significance. On the Academies' report, Hinchey says:
"It is the strongest report on TCE that we have had," said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), whose district includes hundreds of homes that have air filtration systems to eliminate TCE vapors from the ground. "The fact that we have this TCE-laden drinking water used by millions of people is abominable."
Reached for comment by the Times, the National Resources Defense Council's (NRDC) Gina Solomon offers:
"That is a very strong statement, a ringing endorsement of the EPA's 2001 draft risk assessment," said Solomon, an associate clinical professor of medicine at UC San Francisco and a staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Solomon said the report also rejected a key position of the chemical industry and Pentagon environmental experts that TCE was not dangerous at low levels of exposure.
Jerry Ensminger has been engaged in a 9-year battle with the federal government over a community's exposure to TCE at Camp Lejeune, NC. He was reached for comment by the Times:
"We can't afford any more delays," said Jerry Ensminger, a former Marine drill sergeant who served at Camp Lejuene, where drinking water supplies were tainted. His daughter died at age 9 in 1976 from leukemia, which Ensminger blamed on TCE exposure.

Ensminger said he was heartened by the report's conclusions, but remained concerned about whether the government would move quickly to deal with the chemical contamination.

"I want to know why the Bush administration does not err on the side of life when it comes to the environment," he said.
The report becomes available to the public at 4 pm EDT today. It will be posted to the National Academies website and linked here as soon as we can get to it. For the full LA Times story, see here.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Now in Norco: Angst (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, July 21, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
A presentation from DTSC this past Thursday reportedly stirred angst from residents:
"Even though the levels found in the buildings are less than in the science building, it doesn't mean it's not going to get worse," said Tony Mauro of CAG.

The state Department of Toxic Substances Control presented CAG and concerned residents with the latest developments in the ongoing Wyle Labs Inc. investigation and cleanup Thursday evening.

[...]

Don Hamann, a Norco resident, said he believes the low levels of vinyl chloride may be the reason his niece, Nicole Schulz, 14, was recently diagnosed with leukemia.

"They keep saying the levels they find are safe," Hamann said. "There's no way."

Pat Brunell said she attended the meeting for answers. Her home was one of 27 that were sampled for contaminants.

"I guess we have a plume under our house," she said. "Our house is for sale, but obviously no one will buy it. They checked the air and drilled in our backyard two months ago, and we still haven't heard the results or what to do."
Read the full story in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (CA)

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Vinyl chloride in indoor air in Norco; Source identification in progress (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, July 19, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In what appears to be a recap only (i.e. it doesn't appear that any new vinyl chloride discoveries are being reported in this article), the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario, CA) reported:
Low levels of contaminants have been detected in buildings adjacent to the Norco High library, and the state wants to know where the chemicals are coming from and why.

Norco High sits near Wyle Laboratories and was among several areas tested for cancer-causing chemicals that leaked from the former munitions-testing site and into the community.

Rafat Abbasi, senior project manager for the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the agency overseeing the Wyle cleanup and investigation, said low levels of vinyl chloride were detected in the school’s Buildings B and D, located in the northern section of campus, in May.

[...]

"Once we have completed the investigation on the high school, we’ll be in a better position to say what the source of the vinyl chloride is," Abbasi said. "We need to find the source, but the investigation is complicated. That’s why we’re requiring (Wyle) to do an extensive investigation."

DTSC has asked Wyle to submit a proposal on how it will conduct the testing at the buildings.

Wyle Labs tested munitions, rocket motors and electronics at its site – not far from the high school – from the 1950s to 2002. Cancer-causing chemicals leaked from the site into surrounding areas.

The contaminants included vinyl chloride, a chemical found in pipes and trichloroethylene (TCE), an industrial solvent.

Abbasi and Sandy Friedman, DTSC public information officer, said the new levels may be the result of TCE in the groundwater breaking down into vinyl chloride. The groundwater under the school has been tested and shown to be contaminated with TCE.

Sunday, July 9, 2006

More vinyl chloride found in Norco High School air (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, July 9, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Vinyl Chloride has been found in the air in another building at Norco High School. Officials claim they are still trying to pinpoint the source.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Norco school to get air flow enhancers (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, June 29, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week's Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (CA) reported:
This weekend, while Norco High School students enjoy their summer, air flow enhancer devices will be installed in three of the school's science rooms to reduce the levels of cancer-causing chemicals that leaked from the 429-acre Wyle Laboratories site nearby.

And officials from the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the state agency overseeing the Wyle Labs cleanup, are still trying to persuade residents within the contamination plume to let them test for contaminants inside their homes.
Read the full story here.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Lodi needs a plan 'B' (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Last week, in the first of a two-part story, the Lodi News-Sentinal (CA) reported:
Lodi city staff suggested deep cuts to city services today when asked to describe how a ballot initiative to overturn the city's water rate increase would affect the General Fund's bottom line if the initiative is successful.

The city needs to raise nearly $50 million to clean the solvents PCE and TCE from groundwater under the central part of the city. To do so, the City Council late last year passed a rate increase that over three phases would add $10.50 to the bill for a three-bedroom home.

Measure H, the voter initiative that will appear on the Nov. 7 ballot, would reverse that increase and the city would need to find money to pay for the cleanup plan this year, not to mention later years.

Members of the Lodi City Council heard city staff's ideas today on how to make up a $3 million shortfall if the measure passes. Those ideas include:

• Eliminating two downtown bicycle patrol officers, three traffic officers, a sergeant and school resource officers from the Lodi Police Department.

• Eliminating eight positions in the Public Works Department, including street sweeping and graffiti abatement.

• Eliminating arts grants, the Youth Commission and First Friday Night Art Hop from Hutchins Street Square.

• Reducing Lodi Public Library hours from 64 to 53 and cutting some literacy programs.
Read more here: Part I, Part II

Monday, June 26, 2006

Lawyer: Modesto PCE verdict could have national ramifications (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Monday, June 26, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Attorney Duane Miller, whose Sacramento-based law firm, Miller Axline & Sawyer, represents Modesto, said the jury's verdicts could have statewide as well as national ramifications.

"We believe this is the first verdict of its kind anywhere to impose punitive damages on a manufacturer of PCE," Miller said Wednesday. "I don't know if this is going to lead to similar claims. Certainly, many cities are similarly affected."
Read more at The Progress Report

Friday, June 16, 2006

Lodi vs. Modesto: A tale of two cities' toxins lawsuits (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 16, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Helping to distinguish two very different strategies and outcomes, the Stockton Record (CA) reports:
Lodi wrote new ordinances, floated new legal theories and spent about $30 million on a losing strategy to get its contaminated soil and groundwater cleaned.

Modesto used tried-and-true legal methods in a similar cleanup effort. On Tuesday, Modesto was awarded $175 million by a San Francisco Superior Court jury that found chemical companies acted maliciously in failing to disclose the harmful effects of a common dry-cleaning solvent.

Modesto's victory comes after eight years of legal wrangling and a four-month trial. Like Modesto, Lodi also has waged a long legal battle to have perchloroethylene, or PCE, removed from beneath the central city. But unlike Modesto, Lodi sued property owners and businesses it claimed were responsible for discharging PCE onto the ground and into the city's leaky sewers.

On June 4, 2004, a federal judge invited Lodi's attorneys to copy Modesto's strategy, but the city declined. Lodi's water ratepayers are funding a majority of the cleanup through a 38 percent rate hike imposed last year by the City Council, even though the case against some suspected polluters is still open.

"It's just sad," said Jane Lea, who successfully led a grass-roots effort to place a measure on the November ballot that, if it passes, will rescind the rate increase. "What a difference a decision makes. Two similar cases, and one comes down to where the citizens have to pay for it all. It's disheartening. I'm happy for (Modesto) that they found an equitable way for their citizens to have their water cleaned."

Superfund data being withheld from public (D.C)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 16, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
According to this morning's Los Angeles Times (CA):
Senate Democrats on Thursday accused the Bush administration of withholding key details about toxic waste sites that present risks of exposure to nearby residents.

At a congressional hearing, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said the Environmental Protection Agency had designated as confidential the details of about 140 Superfund sites where toxic exposure remained uncontrolled.

Boxer and other Democrats said the secret data included information about how much money and time it would take to clean up the dangerous sites, including one site where the EPA predicted it would take 26 years to close off access to toxics.

"This isn't a question of left or right," Boxer said, waving a document marked "Privileged" by EPA officials to prevent its release to the public. "This is a question of right and wrong."

The EPA said that it had blocked only information related to law enforcement and that the public had access to all relevant health-risk data for the sites, seven of which are in California.
Read the full story here

$175 million punitive damage award in Modesto PCE pollution case (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, June 16, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
According to this San Francisco Chronicle (CA) report:
A jury has hit two chemical companies with $175 million in punitive damages for failing to warn dry cleaners about the dangers of a solvent that contaminated underground water in the city of Modesto.

The San Francisco Superior Court jury awarded the city $100 million against Vulcan Materials Co. and $75 million against Dow Chemical Co. Tuesday. On Friday, the same jury assessed those companies and four other manufacturers more than $3.1 million to compensate Modesto for its costs in installing filters to keep the chemical, perchloroethylene, out of its drinking water.

The chemical, widely used in the U.S. dry cleaning industry, has been linked to increased levels of cancer in dry cleaning employees, Duane Miller, a lawyer for the city, said Wednesday. He said the city's lawsuit accused the manufacturers of keeping quiet about the dangers from 1978, when they received the first warnings from the federal government, until 1992, when they started telling dry cleaners not to dispose of the chemical in sinks or sewers.

"We have conduct that went on for more than a decade involving a chemical that was considered to be a known human carcinogen, with effects on a large number of people,'' Miller said. He said most of the contamination occurred from the 1960s until the mid-1980s, and cleanup is continuing at several sites in Modesto, one of which is a federal Superfund site, a designation reserved for the worst toxic pollution.
According to the Stockton Record (CA), the case stands in stark contrast to a "discredited" eight-year legal strategy pursued in Lodi:
Where Lodi sued property owners and businesses it held responsible for underground pollution, Modesto successfully sued manufacturers for failing to warn dry cleaners how to use perchloroethylene properly and how the solvent could harm the environment. The chemical, which also is found in industrial solvents, is a suspected human carcinogen.

"We'll look back at the issues that concerned us and see if there are any new ideas," Lodi City Attorney Steve Schwabauer said, adding that he expects city officials to be criticized for their decision in 2004 in light of the Modesto verdict. "Two years ago, we had so many huge battles going on ... . We couldn't be tied up in any more litigation."

After Lodi fired its environmental law team in January 2004, its new lawyers briefly considered following Modesto's lead. U.S. District Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr., at a June 4, 2004, hearing in Sacramento's federal court, invited Lodi's attorneys to sue manufacturers after a state appeals court ruled the previous week that Modesto's suit could go forward.

Schwabauer said Tuesday that the city was in such turmoil at the time that it didn't want to pursue another untested legal theory. Not only had it spent $30million on an unwinding legal theory, but Wall Street financier Lehman Bros. was suing the city over a $16million loan.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Perchlorate detected at Alhambra Superfund site (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, June 15, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Pasadena Star-News (CA) reports:
Toxic chemical perchlorate has been detected in small amounts in monitoring wells in the Alhambra Superfund site, although water experts disagree on its significance.

Because the levels fluctuate and have not been found in drinking water samples so far, the federal Environmental Protection Agency and the city water company are focusing on other contaminants.

But the regional water authority is more concerned.

"Usually you get a hit, and usually over time it increases," said Gabriel Monares, director of resources for the San Gabriel Valley Water Quality Authority. "It means there's a flow, and it's starting to go that way."

[...]

Production wells are deeper than monitoring wells and can run 600 to 700 feet deep, Montan said. While monitoring wells are designed to characterize underground contamination, they aren't necessarily representative of water people are drinking, said Lisa Hanusiak, U.S. EPA remedial project manager.

"We intentionally install the wells where we think we are going to detect contamination - in former industrial areas and whatnot," she said. "Monitoring well data is more conservative in measuring the highest levels of contamination."

The EPA and city say focus should remain on cleanup of volatile organic compounds, or VOCs, a major area contaminant. Driving current investigations is the search for VOCs, specifically those known as TCE, PCE and 1,2,3-TCP, Hanusiak said.

The chemicals are commonly used as industrial solvents. The city has awarded bids to construct a 7,000-gallon-per-minute facility to treat those contaminants.

However, the San Gabriel Water Quality Authority worries the perchlorate problem could worsen, making cleanup more expensive and complicated.

"If perchlorate is there, it takes a $4 to $6 million project and turns it into a $30 million dollar project," Monares said.

[...]

"[Perchlorate is] the big bad word right now," said Bob Kuhn, San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority board member. "That's what everyone's afraid of."

[...]

"We're having a hard time finding out where it's coming from," Monares said, adding that funding any necessary cleanup becomes trickier. "We need the state to step up and help us."
Read the full story here

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Catching up on '06 news re: Wyle Labs and Norco schools (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Somehow we've missed a fair amount of info re: vapor intrusion in Norco schools and concerns about contamination from Wyle Labs. Since the The Press-Enterprise (CA) provides a helpful page dedicated to the Wyle Labs contamination story (free reg. req'd), we're able to provide this news roundup, picking up from November of last year and continuing up to this past March:

Wyle reportedly claimed that Vinyl Chloride detected in the Norco High Science building wasn't theirs. This put an unexpected snag in the state's clean-up plan. Wyle's claims didn't appear to have everyone convinced, as it was reported that the mother of a female student said she believes her daughter's leukemia (recently diagnosed) may be due to contamination from Wyle Labs. This was said to be the third case of leukemia from the high school within the past three years and the girl's mother was told by the local doctor to pull her other child out of the school.

Experts from the state denied there is any connection between illness and the contamination at a meeting in which they tell the locals: the contaminant levels are low, the kids are not at risk, teachers are only sort-of at risk. Folks didn't seem convinced; at least one called for the closure of the Science building.

In early March, state investigators found cracks in the bedrock under the community and hailed the discovery as a major breakthrough in tracking the Wyle contamination. At the same time, the state also indicated it would order Wyle to test the indoor air in homes.

Finally, in later March, another public meeting was held...and another parent called for the closing of the Norco High Science building.

--

And as far as we know, that brings us current with published reports. If we learn more, as always, we'll keep you posted.

Report: The Trichloroethylene Legacy in the Los Angeles Area (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Lenny Siegel, Director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO), has authored an eye-opening report on the state of trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination and TCE clean-up in and around Los Angeles. The report, available here as an MS Word doc (91KB), tells us:
The Los Angeles Metropolitan Area is a checkerboard of underground plumes of trichloroethylene (TCE), a cancer-causing industrial solvent, largely a legacy of military activities, military contracting, and support industries during the Cold War. At the request of Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles, the Center for Public Environmental Oversight has identified at least 114 major TCE sites in the Los Angeles area. Though state and federal environmental agencies have taken action to ensure that many of the sites are slowly being cleaned up, no one has taken a comprehensive look at the risks that TCE and similar compounds pose today to the metropolitan area’s population, in drinking water, indoor air, and outdoor air. In fact, there is not even a complete map of known TCE contamination in the region.
To download CPEO's list of 114 TCE sites in the greater Los Angeles area, click here (MS Excel, 52KB). Or, you can hop on over to CPEO's publications page to download this and other reports.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Lodi will vote on water rate in November; may impact clean-up (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Sunday, June 11, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The Lodi News-Sentinel (CA) reports:
Voters will be asked to weigh in on the city's water rate increase, as the Lodi City Council voted to certify the initiative and place it on the November ballot.

But faced with the question of where to find $3 million for cleanup costs if the measure passes, council members also ordered city staff to pore over the city's budget to see where that money would come from and what effect it would have on city services.

Resident Jane Lea, who along with resident Dawn Squires mounted a drive in February to get the rate-rolback initiative on the Nov. 7 ballot, said the council's action, which was required by law, will give "disenfranchised" ratepayers a voice on the increase.
Read the full story here.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Toxic vapor risk from El Toro TCE? Read this. (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In December of 2004, Lenny Siegel from the Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO) published this report, entitled "El Toro and the Potential for Vapor Intrusion." After reviewing documentation and touring the base, Lenny concludes:
In summary, I am not satisfied with the Navy's outright dismissal of vapor intrusion - to indoor or outdoor air - as a risk at El Toro. I think it's unlikely to be a serious problem, but I believe air sampling is necessary before ruling it out. The entire situation seems to be saved by the reuse plan and the division of the property between sale and lease parcels. The sections most likely to be sources of VOC vapors are not being sold, and they are not planned for continuous human presence. Measures, such as institutional controls, should be implemented to keep it that way.
Read the full report here.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

El Toro site nominated for 2005 Defense Department environmental award (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
(This news has us thinking of creating a new post category: Ironic)

It appears the former El Toro contamination site, also known as Former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) El Toro, was nominated for a 2005 Secretary of Defense Environmental Award in the category of Environmental Restoration.

From the 2005 awards guidance document [MS WORD, 416KB], the Environmental Restoration award was created:
To recognize efforts to protect human health and the environment by cleaning up identified DoD sites in a timely, cost-efficient, and responsive manner. Nominations may be: (a) from any level of the Military Departments or Defense Agencies and (b) any U.S. Military active or closing installation/civil works facility within the 50 United States and U.S. Territories.
Here's why El Toro was nominated:
Environmental Restoration Supports $649.5 Million Sale of Former MCAS El Toro

During the past two years at the former MCAS El Toro, an extensively detailed Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS), Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST), and Finding of Suitability to Lease (FOSL) for Carve-out Areas covering 3,719 of the station’s 4,712 total acres were completed. Simultaneously, comprehensive environmental restoration efforts focused on the most stringent cleanup criteria - residential use. A total of 956 Locations of Concern (LOCs), consisting of 24 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)/Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites and 932 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) Compliance Program and petroleum sites; comprise the environmental program. Thus far, 858 LOCs attained no further action status and have been closed out, 78 of those during the past two years. Only 19 of the closed out LOCs required advanced cleanup. A key reason for the ongoing success is the strong working relationships and partnerships the El Toro team has established with regulatory agencies on the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Cleanup Team (BCT*). Additionally, the El Toro team has reached out to other regulatory agencies and local entities and established new partnerships to gain valuable insight to further enhance cleanup and restoration.
The site did not win the award. They received an honorable mention. Read the full MCAS El Toro site nomination here [PDF, 1.4MB]


* As described later in the nomination document:
The BCT is a working group composed of representatives from the Navy’s El Toro team, U.S. EPA, Cal-EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)

Navy sought to limit clean-up and liability at El Toro (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
We found this news interesting in light of all that's going on in Irvine right now. It's from a Los Angeles Times article, approximately 6 years ago:
June 27, 2000, Tuesday, Orange County Edition

SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
HEADLINE: NAVY SEEKS LIMITS ON ITS CLEANUP AT EL TORO;UNIT WANTS TO CURB ITS RESPONSIBILITY TO $8 MILLION OF THE $35 MILLION NEEDED TO SOLVE THE BASE'S GROUND-WATER WOES.
BYLINE: SEEMA MEHTA, TIMES STAFF WRITER

Despite repeated pledges to clean up all pollution at El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, the Navy now wants to be released from liability for any water contamination that might be discovered there in the future.

Under a proposed settlement signed by the Department of Justice this month, the Navy would pay $8 million of $35 million required to clean up a 3-mile-wide tainted ground-water plume "in exchange for not being held responsible for any future liability that could result from 'unknown contaminants,'" according to a report from the state Regional Water Quality Control Board in Santa Ana.

[...]

Trichloroethylene (TCE), a possible carcinogen, is also present from heavy use of a toxic solvent to degrease aircraft. The contamination plume, stretching one mile by three miles, is moving one foot per day, and is expected to contaminate local drinking water in 10 to 20 years if it is not cleaned up, said Ron Wildermuth, spokesman for the Orange County Water District.

[...]

But, according to regional water officials, the water districts are reluctant to sign the agreement because of recent concerns that the water is also contaminated by radionuclides and MTBE, a so-called oxygenate that helps gasoline burn more completely.
Read more here.

Friday, May 19, 2006

Map of Aerojet contamination plume
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, May 19, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
This map was published recently in the Sacramento Bee (click picture for slightly larger version):
According to the paper, "The migrating plume of contaminated groundwater found responsible [for] deaths and illnesses in a recently settled case has spread considerably. Aerojet's cleanup efforts, however, have sharply reduced the concentration of pollutants."

Guilty, facing punitive damages, Aerojet settles personal injury lawsuits (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, May 19, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
According to this report in Wednesday's Sacramento Bee:
Aerojet-General Corp. has agreed to pay a $25 million settlement after a jury found the defense contractor responsible for the deaths of three former Rancho Cordova residents and the illnesses of four others who drank tap water contaminated with rocket fuel.

A Sacramento Superior Court jury awarded more than $14 million in damages to the plaintiffs last week following a twomonth trial. Aerojet officials, faced with possible punitive damages, agreed Friday to settle the case for an additional $11 million.

[...]

The jury found Aerojet "was negligent with respect to its operations, chemical handling, treatment and/or disposal process" of toxic chemicals.

"I was very impressed with the intelligence and attention span of the jury," said Gary Praglin, a Los Angeles lawyer representing the plaintiffs.

[...]

The jury's findings pertained to Aerojet's operations in the 1960s and 1970s when the key clean-water and hazardous-materials laws were in their infancy and utilities did not routinely monitor drinking water for the chemicals Aerojet dumped. At the time, Aerojet disposed of residual rocket fuel and metalcleaning solvents in unlined open pits, allowing the contaminants to seep through the soil and into the groundwater tapped for Rancho Cordova homes.

The case involved three water contaminants linked to Aerojet operations: perchlorate, an oxidizing component of solid rocket propellant known to cause thyroid disorders; NDMA, a cancercausing combustion product of liquid rocket fuel; and trichloroethylene (TCE), an industrial solvent that has been linked to brain damage, liver cancer, skin diseases and immune disorders.

The jury found Aerojet's negligence "was a substantial factor" in causing thyroid disease in the four surviving plaintiffs and in causing the deaths of three others from lymphoma, a cancer of the blood, and melanoma, a skin cancer, according to the verdict. The individual damages awarded ranged from $150,000 to $5 million. The suit was filed in the late 1990s on behalf of the stricken or their survivors: Cheryl Fischer- Smith, who died as a result of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; Pamela Lowndes who succumbed to melanoma; Deangela Smith, Terilynne Steinman and Joan Van Den Berg, for their thyroid disorders; Donna Marinelli, who has thyroid cancer; and her father, Anthony Marinelli, who died of lymphoma.

"The settlement these people got was real nice, but it will not pay for the suffering they went through," said Greg Voetsch, 72, whose family reached itsown settlement about two years ago in a similar case against Aerojet. Before moving to Rancho Cordova in 1970, the family lived in the Los Angeles County city of Azusa - in the shadow of another Aerojet plant. The water supplying that neighborhood has been found to be polluted with perchlorate and TCE.

In the 1980s, Voetsch said his wife, Doris, 70, developed breast cancer. Voetsch said he has had thyroid cancer as have two of his daughters.

Then early this year, after the family bought a new car and began making home improvements with the settlement money, doctors began to find one cancer after another in Doris Voetsch, first in her colon, then her lungs, then her throat and, most recently, a recurrence of breast cancer that led to a full mastectomy.

[...]

California has by far the most extensive perchlorate contamination in the country, with nearly 300 affected wells. Today, the Arden-Cordova Water Service and the Sacramento County Water Agency have 14 fewer wells to serve 60,000 Rancho Cordova residents because of Aerojet pollution. Regulators and affected industries have been wrestling over setting a "safe" limit of perchlorate in drinking water.
Though we've already quoted liberally from it, you can read the full story here.

Note: It looks like the story was carried by the Sacramento Buiness Journal two days earlier. They include an explanation of the size of the lawsuit (# of plaintiffs) over time:
Hundreds of plaintiffs were involved in four lawsuits against Aerojet over perchlorate, a component of rocket fuel, and other contaminants that leached into drinking water wells. Plaintiffs dropped out over time, leaving about 60 plaintiffs in three consolidated lawsuits by summer 2004. By the time trial began, it was down to two cases and 10 plaintiffs, according to courthouse personnel.

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Aerojet pollution in Rancho Cordova: Treat tainted water vs. take wells off-line? (CA)
  2. Map of Aerojet contamination plume
  3. Guilty, facing punitive damages, Aerojet settles personal injury lawsuits (CA)

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Woodbridge/Irvine/El Toro Marine Base contamination plume has people talking...of moving? (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
We're starting to wonder, what the heck is really going on in Woodbridge/Irvine? Amidst concerns about cancer and other maladies associated with TCE exposure and reports that certain entities/authorities may not be leveling with the locals, Toxnews.org recently tells readers:
ToxNews has received emails from Woodbridge homeowners wanting more info about how a now former resident got out from under his home which was located in the contamination area. When we contacted the man who previously disclosed how he was able to successfully get out from under his Woodbridge house to see if we could release his email address, he said, "Tell homeowners to talk with their bank and advise them their realtor failed to disclose the existence of the contamination prior to the sale."
They have also recently added a new detailed close-up map of the contamination plume/area (click here for a much better version - warning: will take you away from this site):

Note: We've added Toxnews.org to our blogroll (to the right). See their latest news section for regular updates. For readers coming here from Toxnews, welcome. Please let us know if there's anything you need.

Friday, May 5, 2006

Department of Defense more powerful than the EPA
by Neil Fischbein on Friday, May 5, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
In light of the recently revealed financial stakes of further TCE regulation for the world's most powerful polluter and the LA Times series on TCE's politics and community impact, we found the following article, entitled "Pollution Cleanups Pit Pentagon Against Regulators," both interesting and disturbing. From everyone's favorite color newspaper, USA Today, in October 2004:
Across the nation, the Pentagon is taking extraordinary steps to limit the military's accountability for a 50-year legacy of pollution, a USA TODAY investigation finds...

Since 2001, Pentagon officials have stalled cleanups at scores of military sites where contamination from training and manufacturing has fouled soil and water. They've used their political clout to sidetrack new regulations that could force the services to spend hundreds of millions of dollars more to deal with pollution. And they've challenged state and federal regulators' power to make the military obey existing environmental laws...

Four years after President Bush campaigned on a pledge to make the military "comply with environmental laws by which all of us must live," the White House is the Pentagon's chief ally in pushing for relief from such laws.

Within the administration, "it's no secret that the EPA is running into this wall with the Pentagon," says Linda Fisher, who served two years as Bush's deputy EPA administrator — the agency's second-in- command — before returning to private work last year.

"Is the Department of Defense taking (regulatory disputes) to the White House more often? Absolutely," says Fisher, who has held environmental jobs in every Republican administration since Ronald Reagan's. "Is the Department of Defense more powerful than the EPA? Yes."

Defense officials say state and federal environmental agencies have too much power to demand costly and intrusive cleanups on military land. The Pentagon wants to cut its $4 billion a year in environmental costs — less than 1% of defense spending — by gaining more authority over where and how cleanups will be done.

"Some of these regulators are doing wrongheaded things based on poor scientific evidence," says Raymond DuBois, deputy undersecretary of Defense for installations and environment. "Shouldn't we, as stewards of the taxpayers' money, decide how we're going to clean up?"
Ummm. No.

The article goes on to highlight key findings of the USA Today investigation:
•The Pentagon is thwarting environmental agencies' efforts to set cleanup rules.

Since 2001, the armed services have delayed more than 70 federal cleanup agreements that would dictate the scope and timing of restoration at contaminated military sites...

The Pentagon also is fighting EPA efforts to set new pollution limits on two military contaminants: perchlorate, a munitions ingredient, and trichloroethylene (TCE), a solvent. After military officials complained to the White House that the EPA's studies overstated the chemicals' health risks, the agency opted to wait for years of additional study before making new rules.

State environmental regulators are facing military resistance, too. In Colorado, California, Ohio and Minnesota, the services are fighting state efforts to restrict the future use of contaminated military property. In California, Florida, Hawaii and Alaska, the military has challenged the authority of state officials to fine the armed forces for pollution problems.

•The EPA is cutting efforts to make the military comply with environmental laws.

•The Pentagon is spending less on cleanups.
If you check out the full article, you can read more about places like Lowry Air Force Base where AF appears to be deciding for itself whether toxic clean-up is really necessary. Or you can check out USA Today's nifty Flash presentation in which you can view the clean-up status of 130 military-owned Superfund sites in 39 states, state by state (OK, we cheated, you can launch it from here. <--- warning, must have flash installed to view).

note: If any readers have a ton of time on their hands, here's a project idea. We'd like to post a list of these 130 military EPA Superfund sites, by state. We'll make it a point to extract all the names and descriptions from the USA Today preso and will post it here when it's complete. It may be some time before we get to this. If anyone wants to get a jump on it in the meantime, we promise we will not complain. We might even be willing to publicly thank you for your effort. If you've got any interest in this project, please let us know.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

New map of Irvine/Woodbridge contamination plume (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, April 20, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
From Toxnews.org, which is providing daily updates of the contamination situation that has residents alarmed. Still no word on the prospect of vapor risk.

[Download PDF map]

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Toxic cleanup not exactly declared complete at NASA/Ames site in Mountain View (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
According to the San Jose Mercury News, three formerly toxic sites at the NASA/Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California have been certified as clean by the state Department of Toxic Substances Control. If you read the fine print, you'll see that EPA is still monitoring at least one of the sites due to ongoing/current TCE contamination.

Yep. You read that right. Current TCE contamination=certified as clean + cleanup complete. This certainly is a mixed-up world we live in, isn't it?

Giant TCE plume in Irvine Ranch Water District; Does it pose a threat? (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, April 11, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
A recent LA Times story about heavy TCE contamination in Southern California mentioned groundwater contamination in Irvine related to the former El Toro Marine base. We've also mentioned the Irvine TCE contamination in the past.

What we didn't realize was that this plume stretches under a reasonably populated area of Irvine. The map we've seen shows an elementary school, apartments, recreation facilities, and more sitting over the plume. So we wonder: Is the TCE plume a current danger to the population? Has vapor intrusion into buildings been explored and ruled out?

TCE readings (groundwater) from the plume have been as high as 140 ppb to 160 ppb*. The plume stretches approximately three miles and covers a total area of 2900 acres. ATSDR conducted a public health assessment in 1993, eventually declaring "At this time, exposure to carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, TCE, PCE, and nitrates-N detected in regional groundwater through incidental ingestion, dermal absorption, and/or inhalation of volatilized contaminants at current levels detected does not represent a public health hazard."

Fast forward about 13 years, and it appears not everyone is so comfortable with the ATSDR's convenient conclusions. Toxnews.org, a recently launched website focused on the Woodbridge/Irvine contamination, pulls no punches: "You and your family may be in danger because of a cancer causing plume of TCE from the El Toro Base that's under your homes, apartments, schools, etc. now!" Check their site for more information, including maps of the contamination area and what appears to be near daily breaking news. For some additional graphics of the TCE plume, have a look at Dissent the Blog.

As always, we'll try to keep you posted.

* EPA's 2002 Vapor Intrusion Guidance recommends taking action to rule out vapor intrusion when TCE levels in groundwater exceed 5 ppb.

Tuesday, April 4, 2006

Concern around Poway landfill: TCE, PCE, and Benzene (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Tuesday, April 4, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
The San Diego Union Tribune (CA) reports:
Last year, routine semi-annual tests found low levels of trichloroethylene, or TCE, and tetrachloroethylene, or PCE, in groundwater near the landfill.

In an effort to identify the source of the solvents, which are common industrial compounds, further tests were conducted, leading to the discovery of benzene on and off the landfill.

[...].

“Our concern was the solvents might be migrating up to the residences through soil vapors,” [hydrogeologist for the county*, Barry Pulver] said. As a result, 20 soil-vapor samples, at a depth of one to five feet, were taken on Dehia in the Garden Road neighborhood.

TCE and PCE levels were low to nonexistent, but benzene was present in all tests, with peak concentrations of 49 parts per billion on the west side of Dehia and steadily decreasing on the east side.
As the article continues, we are told that regular updates on the investigation will be posted to the County of San Diego's Department of Environmental Health website.

A quick review of their website leads to the first installment, where you can read a thoughtfully named fact sheet called Monitoring at Poway Landfill.





* hey, isn't that an old Kenny Rogers song?

Thursday, March 30, 2006

San Gabriel Valley a Hotbed of TCE Contamination (CA)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, March 30, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
So says the LA Times, continuing their excellent coverage (though we must admit, this article ends somewhat strangely. Or is it just us?):
San Gabriel Valley a Hotbed of TCE Contamination
Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties are the most tainted from the toxic industrial solvent.
By Ralph Vartabedian
Times Staff Writer

March 30, 2006

Trichloroethylene contamination has hit almost every state, but none more widely than California. TCE has contaminated water supplies, indoor air near cleanup projects and the air in cities all around the state.

The Environmental Protection Agency has 67 Superfund sites in California with TCE contamination, and state agencies have dozens more, stretching from the shores of the Pacific Ocean to the scrub of the Mojave Desert.

Almost every major military base has a Superfund site with TCE contamination, including Camp Pendleton and Edwards Air Force Base. The Superfund program involves some of the most contaminated sites, usually at dumps, former military bases or closed industrial facilities. TCE was used by the military to degrease metal.

The federal government permits no more than 5 parts per billion of TCE in water. In California, 243 wells have reported violations of the 5-ppb standard from 1997 to 2004, according to California Department of Health Services. Many of those wells have been shut down. In some cases, water agencies use cleaner supplies to dilute the TCEcontaminated water.

The biggest areas of pollution are Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties.


LA Times: TCE, Health, and Community Impact (Part II of II)
by Neil Fischbein on Thursday, March 30, 2006 [Permalink] [0 Comments]
Here's another important piece on TCE From the LA Times (CA) with national scope/importance. This was on Thursday's front page:
Cancer Stalks a 'Toxic Triangle'
Scientists disagree about the risks of TCE. But residents near a former air base are dead certain.
By Ralph Vartabedian
Times Staff Writer

March 30, 2006

SAN ANTONIO — On nearly every block surrounding the former Kelly Air Force Base, small purple crosses sprout from front lawns, marking the homes where cancer has struck.

The residents call their neighborhood the "toxic triangle," alleging that the Air Force poisoned it with an industrial solvent, trichloroethylene, or TCE. It was casually dumped at the base for decades and spread for miles through a shallow aquifer under 22,000 nearby houses.

Texas health authorities have found elevated rates of liver cancer among residents, as well as higher-than-normal rates of birth defects. Though state health officials say it is impossible to prove that TCE causes the sickness here, this blue-collar community has little doubt about the connection.

"We are dying day by day," said Robert Alvarado Sr., who has lived in a small clapboard home for 36 years that sits about 14 feet over the TCE plume. "I have kidney failure, my wife has thyroid cancer, my neighbor just died of breast cancer."

Related Posts (on one page):

  1. San Gabriel Valley a Hotbed of TCE Contamination (CA)
  2. LA Times: TCE, Health, and Community Impact (Part II of II)
  3. LA Times: The politics of TCE (Part I of II)

To read earlier posts in this category (if there are any), please see our archives below: