Prior to 1950, [TCE] was known as dangerous and poisonous in occupational settings involving sustained exposure to high concentrations of TCE, but specific adverse health effects resulting from chronic exposure were not generally understood. Prior to 1950 it was generally known that TCE was not fit to consume and that it should not be in a water supply. The defendant [Air Force] was or should have been aware that substances such as TCE should not be in a water supply.
[...]
Prior to 1950, it was common knowledge that groundwater could be polluted and that the pollution could travel great distances from the site of the original contamination. Further, it was generally known prior to that time that percolation, a process by which substances disposed of would leach into the underlying groundwater, could occur and that groundwater needed to be protected from deleterious leachates.
The appropriate standard of care in waste disposal in the 1950s was to treat TCE as a hazardous substance in disposing of the contaminant so as not to pollute groundwater.
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Statement in response to National Research Council report on Camp Lejeune:
We are disappointed and dismayed at the report titled, “Contaminated Water Supplies at Camp Lejeune – Assessing Potential Health Effects,” released by the National Research Council (NRC) on Saturday, June 13, 2009. This report was two years in preparation by scientists, many of whom we know and respect, that reached puzzling and in some cases erroneous conclusions. We are aware of the complex situation regarding availability and access to data, and each of us has participated in committees advising the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) about how to move forward with health studies. It is our view that the Marines and their families who were exposed to dangerous chemicals in the Camp Lejeune drinking water over several decades deserve to know if this exposure has had an effect on their health. The most direct way to assess this is to conduct valid epidemiologic studies of those who lived or worked there, and we urge ATSDR to continue their efforts to carry these to conclusion. The overall judgment about the impact of the chemicals on health can then be informed both by the general scientific literature the NRC reviewed, plus findings from directly relevant studies of the exposed population.
Specific areas where we disagree with the NRC report include their assessment of the water distribution modeling, their assessment of the risk caused by exposure to two of the principal contaminants (TCE and PCE), and the likelihood of conducting meaningful epidemiologic studies in this setting. We view the water modeling undertaken by ATSDR and its consultants as “state-of-the-art” and worth carrying through to completion so that it can be used in the on-going and proposed health studies. There may be uncertainties about specific levels of exposure for individual households or people, but these can be described in the study results. We also agree with the National Toxicology Program that TCE and PCE are “reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogens” and reject the characterization of the evidence as “limited/suggestive” as presented in the NRC report. We note that this characterization of solvent mixtures actually steps back from previous work done by the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine in 2003. Finally, we disagree with the thrust of the NRC report that it is unlikely that scientifically informative epidemiologic studies of the Camp Lejeune population can be done. The NRC doubts that “definitive” answers can come from any study, but this sets the bar too high – no one study can provide definitive answers, and all studies must be considered in the light of other scientific evidence. From our experience in other settings, we believe that useful studies of the Camp Lejeune population are possible and furthermore that the Marines and their families deserve our government’s best efforts to carry them out.
For these reasons, we urge the ATSDR to consider this particular NRC report in the context of other expert advice they have received during the past decade and the competent work already done by agency staff. Since the NRC report is at such variance with the recommendations of other water modeling and epidemiologic experts, we believe it should not stand as the final word.
Sincerely,
Ann Aschengrau, Sc.D., Professor, Associate Chair of the Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health
Richard Clapp, D.Sc., MPH, Professor, Boston University School of Public Health
David Ozonoff, MD, MPH, Professor and Chair Emeritus of the Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health
Daniel Wartenberg, Ph.D., Professor, Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Sandra Steingraber, Ph.D., Scholar in Residence, Ithaca College
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- (Updated) Camp Lejeune lawsuit: What we know so far... (NC)
- Searching for affected Camp Lejeune Marines and families (MA and IA)
- 17 cases of male breast cancer among those exposed at Camp Lejeune (NC)...
- New federal lawsuit re: exposure and 'disinformation' at Camp Lejeune (NC)
- Scientists speak out on CL Report: Disappointed, Dismayed, Disagree; Should Not Stand as Final Word (NC)
- Senator Burr Presses on Camp Lejeune Report at Hearing (NC)...
- Limit study of Camp Lejeune, says solvents industry (NC)
- New community site added - THE STAND (NC)
- Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
Sunday, June 14, 2009
The available scientific information does not provide a sufficient basis for determining whether the population at Camp Lejeune has, in fact, suffered adverse health effects as a result of exposure to contaminants in the water supplies.Though we're not yet through the whole thing, the report appears to raise more questions than it answers — not so much about the
[...]
[T]hese limitations cannot be overcome with additional study. Thus, the committee concludes that there is no scientific justification for the Navy and Marine Corps to wait for the results of additional health studies before making decisions about how to follow up on the evident solvent exposures on the base and their possible health consequences.
Andrea over at The Few, The Proud, The Forgotten has posted the the full report (PDF), as well as the report brief (PDF) and the executive summary (PDF).
We'll be back with thoughts and questions once we trudge through the full report...stay tuned.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- (Updated) Camp Lejeune lawsuit: What we know so far... (NC)
- Searching for affected Camp Lejeune Marines and families (MA and IA)
- 17 cases of male breast cancer among those exposed at Camp Lejeune (NC)...
- Update: Camp Lejeune Attorneys (NC)
- National Academy of Sciences releases doozy of a report on Camp Lejeune (NC)
- Bill Smith, male breast cancer survivor, Camp Lejeune (FL, NC)...
- Limit study of Camp Lejeune, says solvents industry (NC)
- New community site added - THE STAND (NC)
- Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
ScienceDaily (Feb. 21, 2008) — The consequence of maternal exposure to a variety of potentially toxic agents during pregnancy remains the prime focus of concern in scientific endeavors and in society at large.We already know that TCE-exposure, even at low levels, can cause permanent genetic damage. The notion that this damage is passed along by TCE-exposed fathers to subsequent generations has staggering public health implications for millions of Americans.
However, there is now mounting evidence that paternal exposure can also adversely affect fetal and postnatal development of offspring and that this imprint can be expressed in subsequent generations.
[...]
The reported impact on offspring outcome includes low birth weight; increase in childhood cancers; developmental, behavioral, endocrine abnormalities and cross-generational effects.
To be fair, we should mention this news came in the form of a symposium announcement rather than as a breaking investigative story. The symposium is being organized by Gladys Friedler, Ph.D., of Boston University School of Medicine and is entitled The Father and Fetus Revisited. You can read more about it here.
Friday, February 15, 2008
Starting with this issue, Water Technology® will provide each month basic information about a contaminant found in water sources. The contaminant may not necessarily be found in all geographic locations or situations, or at levels sufficient to raise concern.Their inaugural column includes, amongst other things, the molecular structure of TCE:
In addition, the article includes details in the following categories:
Chemical formulaIt's a quick reference and a good overview. Check it out here.
Molecular weight
Physical characteristics
Where found
Common uses
Potential health effects
Regulation
Common water treatment methods
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Researchers studied more than 2,100 men who worked at the Rocketdyne facility in the San Fernando Valley, many of whom were exposed to radiation and chemicals that may have increased their risk for certain cancers. The research team identified 362 men who developed prostate cancer and compared them to 1,805 men of similar age and socioeconomic status who did not get prostate cancer.Though the focus on physical activity appears to be the main thrust of this research, we think the TCE-related finding is worth highlighting.
The study, done in conjunction with researchers at the Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute and the University of Michigan, appears in the February issue of the journal Cancer Causes Control.
"The message from this study for today is that if you're more active, you may be able to prevent this cancer from happening," said Beate Ritz, a Jonsson Cancer Center researcher, an associate professor of epidemiology in the UCLA School of Public Health and the study's senior author. "If you have a desk job, do something physically active to counterbalance it."
[...]
The study found that the men who developed prostate cancer were less likely to hold the more physically active jobs. Those that got cancer also were more likely than the control group to be highly exposed to the chemicals that were evaluated, including hydrazine, benzene, mineral oil, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and trichloroethylene (TCE), which are known or suspected carcinogens.
Read the news about the study here. For the study itself ("Nested case–control study of occupational physical activity and prostate cancer among workers using a job exposure matrix"), see here.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Prostate cancer at Rocketdyne linked to TCE exposure (CA)
- New TCE detected in Runkle Canyon near Rocketdyne/Santa Susana Field Laboratory (CA)
- Independent report: Radiation from Rocketdyne likely caused cancers (CA)...
- New community site added: Clean Up Rocketdyne
- Plan for houses near Rocketdyne lab causes concern (CA)
- Boeing report: No cancer death increase linked to Rocketdyne lab (CA)
Monday, January 14, 2008
Purdue helping to remove pollutants using poplars
January 14, 2008
The news
Purdue University researchers and Chrysler LLC are collaborating on a project using modified poplar trees to eliminate pollutants from a former oil-storage facility near Kokomo.
In laboratory experiments, the trees have been shown to be capable of absorbing trichloroethylene, or TCE, and other pollutants. The pollutants are then turned into harmless byproducts.
The study
Richard Meilan, a Purdue associate professor of forestry and natural resources with Purdue's Hardwood Tree Improvement and Regeneration Center and the Center for Tree Genetics, co-authored a study published last fall that showed poplar cuttings could remove 90 percent of TCE from a solution in one week.
The trees are called transgenic poplars because they have an inserted gene that aids the breakdown of TCE and other environmental pollutants.
TCE is the most common groundwater pollutant on Superfund sites and causes various human health problems when in the water or air.
The study was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The process
Meilan believes the poplars will be able to absorb the TCE from the site with their roots. Peter's Pond was contaminated by oil stored there in the 1960s. The oil is now within 10 feet of the surface, easily reachable by poplar roots.
There is concern by some that the inserted genes could escape the trees and invade other natural tree populations, but Meilan said he's trying to make sure that isn't the case by removing the trees before they reach sexual maturity.
"It is legitimate to be concerned about transgenic plants, but we are taking comprehensive steps to ensure that our transgenes don't escape into the environment," Meilan said.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Chemical linked to Parkinson's diseaseRead the full story here. (Thanks to KM for the tip!)
By Sarah Vos
SVOS@HERALD-LEADER.COM
In the late 1970s, Eddie Abney cleaned grease from metal gauges at a Berea factory using a chemical solvent called trichloroethylene, or TCE. The chemical, which is still used today as an industrial degreaser, soaked through his cotton gloves and into his skin. It splattered on his clothes. He breathed in its vapors.
At night, when he came home, he would tell his wife that the smell was killing him.
It may have been.
Researchers at the University of Kentucky have linked industrial use of TCE to Parkinson's disease, which Abney has. It was Abney, 51, who pointed researchers to a possible connection, leading to a study that was published last month in the online version of Annals of Neurology, a journal of the American Neurological Association.
The study shows a clear link between an environmental contaminant and Parkinson's, said Don Gash, the lead researcher.
TCE has been suspected before as a cause of Parkinson's, but the UK study shows a "clear-cut link" from exposure to the chemical to the disease's development, Gash said. "We've connected the dots."
The study found that three people who directly handled TCE at the factory where Abney worked developed Parkinson's disease. An additional 14, who breathed in its vapors, had early symptoms of Parkinson's, but not the disease itself. And 13 more, who were also exposed to vapors, didn't show signs of parkinsonism but had slower fine motor skills than others their age.
[...]
When Abney was diagnosed with Parkinson's in 2001, he and his wife, Susan, wondered whether TCE could have been the cause. Sometimes Parkinson's has a genetic tie, but Eddie Abney didn't have family history of Parkinson's. Environmental factors had been linked to the disease: exposure to certain pesticides or recreational use of MTPT, known commonly as synthetic heroin.
But Abney wondered whether, in his case, it was TCE. He remembered the strong smell of the chemical he had worked with for more than two decades with little protection.
"I had gloves on, but they were just white cotton gloves," Abney said. "If they got wet, they got saturated."
A year after his diagnosis, Abney participated in a clinical drug trial for Parkinson's disease at UK. When he told a researcher his medical history, he mentioned the exposure to TCE, and the fact that others from the factory had Parkinson's. The researcher, Kathyrn Rutland, thought it sounded like a cluster of cases.
"We felt like there was enough there to really get started," said Gash, the lead researcher.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Story of the TCE/Parkinson study
- TCE Exposure linked to Parkinsons disease
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Public release date: 7-Jan-2008Thanks to Lenny Siegel, Director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO), for the tip
Contact: Amy Molnar
amolnar@wiley.com
Wiley-Blackwell
Trichloroethylene is a risk factor for parkinsonism
Parkinson's disease, the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder caused by aging, can also be caused by pesticides and other neurotoxins. A new study found strong evidence that trichloroethylene (TCE) is a risk factor for parkinsonism, a group of nervous disorders with symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease. TCE is a chemical widely used in industry that is also found in drinking water, surface water and soil due to runoff from manufacturing sites where it is used. The study was published in the October 2007 issue of Annals of Neurology (http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/ana), the official journal of the American Neurological Association.
Led by Don M. Gash and John T Slevin, of the University of Kentucky in Lexington, KY, researchers conducting a clinical trial of 10 Parkinson's disease patients came across a patient who described long-term exposure to TCE, which he suspected to be a risk factor in his disease. TCE has been identified as an environmental contaminant in almost 60 percent of the Superfund priority sites listed by the Environmental Protection Agency and there has been increasing concern about its long term effects. The patient noted that some of his co-workers had also developed Parkinson's disease, which led to the current study of this patient and two of his co-workers diagnosed with Parkinson's disease who underwent neurological evaluations to assess motor function. All of these individuals had at least a 25 year history of occupational exposure to TCE, which included both inhalation and exposure to it from submerging their unprotected arms and forearms in a TCE vat or touching parts that had been cleaned in it. In addition, questionnaires about experiencing signs of Parkinson�s disease, such as slowness of voluntary movement, stooped posture and trouble with balance, were mailed to 134 former workers. The researchers also conducted studies in rats to determine how TCE affects the brain.
The results showed that 14 former employees who reported three or more parkinsonian signs worked close to the TCE source, were found to exhibit signs of parkinsonism when they were examined and were significantly (up to 250 percent) slower in fine motor hand movements than age-matched controls. Clinical exams of 13 patients who reported no signs of parkinsonism revealed that they worked in the same areas as the symptomatic workers or further from the TCE vat, they exhibited some mild features of the condition and their fine motor movements were also significantly slower than controls, although they were faster than the group with symptoms. The rat studies showed that TCE exposure inhibited mitochondrial function (which in humans is associated with a wide range of degenerative diseases) in the substantia nigra, an area in the brain that produces dopamine and whose destruction is associated with Parkinson's disease. Specifically, Complex 1, an enzyme important in energy production, was significantly reduced in the substantia nigra. Dopamine neurons in this area also showed degenerative changes following TCE administration.
The authors acknowledge that while the study was not a large scale epidemiological investigation, the results demonstrate a strong potential link between chronic TCE exposure and parkinsonism. 'It will be important to follow the progression of movement disorders in this cohort over the next decade to fully assess the long-term health risks from trichloroethylene exposure,' they state. Although previous studies identified pesticides as a risk factor for Parkinson's disease, the drug MPTP was previously the only mitochrondrial neurotoxin linked to the disease. The authors conclude: 'Trichloroethylene is implicated as a principal risk factor for parkinsonism based on its dopaminergic neurotoxicity in animal models, the high levels of chronic dermal and inhalation exposure to trichloroethylene by the three workers with Parkinson's disease, the motor slowing and clinical manifestations of parkinsonism in co-workers clustered around the trichloroethylene source, and the mounting evidence of neurotoxic effects in other reports of chronic trichloroethylene exposure.'
Related Posts (on one page):
- Story of the TCE/Parkinson study
- TCE Exposure linked to Parkinsons disease
Monday, June 18, 2007
The following piece was published in The Oregonian on Thursday, June 14th and authored by Tom Griffith, professor emeritus of physics at Pacific University and secretary of the View-Master Citizens Advisory Group. We're reprinting this in full with Tom's permission:
The exposure that needs more exposureNext time a politician or federal representative (EPA, ATSDR, NIOSH, etc) tells you that they would like nothing better than to study the link between TCE and disease (but laments that it is oh so hard to find a good study population), make sure to ask them why they refuse to study View-Master.
Thursday, June 14, 2007
In 1998, high levels of the organic solvent trichloroethylene -- known as TCE -- were discovered in the drinking water of the View-Master plant in Beaverton. The levels were 300 times the maximum established as safe at that time by the Environmental Protection Agency. It's estimated that as many as 25,000 workers were exposed, some of them to high levels of TCE for 30 years or more.
TCE is a probable carcinogen and is known to produce health effects besides cancer with high enough exposures. It was a commonly used degreaser and dry-cleaning fluid from 1950 to 1980, and there are more than 3,000 sites around the country where it is present in groundwater. But very few of these sites have produced levels of exposure anywhere near those at View-Master.
Since discovery of the contamination, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has implemented a remediation plan for cleaning up the groundwater beneath the site. This cleanup is ongoing and will take at least 20 more years to complete.
The Oregon State Public Health Division completed a limited mortality study of the site in 2004, designed to determine whether a more thorough study was called for, and it more than met that goal. It showed death rates for kidney cancer in women workers at the plant were roughly six times higher than the rates for other Oregon residents of similar age. It also found high rates for a few other cancers.
Since then, however, efforts to conduct a more thorough study have been stymied by a lack of money. It's been almost 10 years since the initial discovery of the TCE contamination, and nothing definitive has been done.
In the meantime, former View-Master workers are left in a fog regarding what health problems they might face and what they should do about it. Some of these workers clearly face an increased risk of cancer and other ill effects. The number potentially harmed is large. Some have already died.
The irony is that the View-Master workers represent an ideal population to gain better knowledge of the effects of exposure to TCE, a national problem. These workers were exposed at high levels to essentially a single contaminant over a long period of time. And their numbers are large enough to provide reliable statistics. In other words, studying them has a high probability of producing definitive results that will be useful in assessing the effects of TCE exposure at other sites.
So why has such a study not been funded? It's a complicated story, but the problem lies, at least in part, with bureaucratic buck-passing among the federal agencies that could provide the money to pursue it. No one in the vast alphabet soup of federal agencies seems to have a clear mission to fund epidemiology research of this nature.
But the state of Oregon is not blameless either. The Public Health Division has no direct funds allocated for such research. The state scientists in the epidemiology department must find external money through grants to get anything accomplished.
Those charged with protecting our health and safety need to step up and see that the appropriate scientific work is done at View-Master. Otherwise, the funds already spent will have been wasted and the former View-Master workers will be left with no good information. Just as importantly, our nation will have missed an opportunity to learn something definitive about a national concern.
So who will step up as the buck passes along? The View-Master workers aren't getting any younger.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Why not study the company-wide TCE exposures at View-Master? (OR)
- Dr. Austin to discuss TCE and cancer at View-Master Health Study Citizens Advisory Group meeting Tuesday (OR)
- Support Victims of TCE Exposure at the Punk Rock Circus (OR)...
- Report: Need for more study at View-Master (OR)
- Family sues View-Master operators in cancer death (OR)
- New community site added - View-Master/V.O.T.E. (OR)
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Camp Lejeune Water Under Scrutiny
The former residents, who together seek nearly $4 billion, believe their families were afflicted by water containing industrial solvents before the Marines shut off the bad wells in the mid-1980s.
Dates Important in Water Contamination
Key events in the contamination of drinking water at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.
Solvents in Water Present Perils
Industrial solvents known as TCE and PCE are known health hazards, but the amount of exposure that can cause harm is subject to debate.
Update (June 13):
Congress investigates tainted water at Marine base by Kimberly Hefling
The government Tuesday disclosed results from a new study the same day lawmakers listened to emotional testimony from families about cancers and other illnesses they blame on tainted tap water at the sprawling base.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- (Updated) Camp Lejeune lawsuit: What we know so far... (NC)
- Searching for affected Camp Lejeune Marines and families (MA and IA)
- 17 cases of male breast cancer among those exposed at Camp Lejeune (NC)...
- Camp Lejeune: Who to contact for more information? (NC)
- Associated Press articles re: Camp Lejeune and TCE/PCE
- Hearing tomorrow re: Camp Lejeune; Webcast available (DC, NC)...
- Limit study of Camp Lejeune, says solvents industry (NC)
- New community site added - THE STAND (NC)
- Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Occupational trichloroethylene exposure as a cause of idiosyncratic generalized skin disorders and accompanying hepatitis similar to drug hypersensitivities [View abstract or purchase]After reading the abstract and the paper, we decided a layman's summary was warranted. Here's our attempt:
Authors: Kamijima, Michihiro1; Hisanaga, Naomi; Wang, Hailan; Nakajima, Tamie
Source: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Volume 80, Number 5, April 2007 , pp. 357-370(14)
Publisher: Springer
Researchers reviewed cases of severe generalized skin disorders and accompanying hepatitis in workers exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE). They attempted to compare TCE-induced skin disorders to similar disorders caused by hypersensitivity to medications.
Not only was the frequency of skin disorders in TCE-exposed workers greater than the occurrence of such disorders caused by medicine-hypersensitivity, the TCE-induced skin disorders were accompanied by a higher rate of fever, hepatitis, and lymphadenopathy (swelling of the lymph nodes). [Note: For several reasons, the incidence rate/frequency surveyed does not seem to offer much predictive power.]
Patients suffering from TCE-related generalized skin disorders typically show rash on the extremities, face, neck or trunk with/without fever 2 weeks to 2 months after commencement of occupational TCE exposure. Some experienced recurrences after going back to their worksites. These findings indicate a clear temporal relationship between TCE exposure and the disorder occurrence.
TCE-induced skin disorders found in the review include:
- Exfoliative Dermatitis (widespread scaling of the skin, often with itching (pruritus), skin redness (erythroderma), and hair loss.)
- Erythema Multiforme (multiple skin lesions; can be accompanied by itching, fever, and general ill-feeling)
- Stevens-Johnson syndrome (a much more severe condition than erythema multiforme. SJS typically involves multiple areas of the body and extensive lesion formation. The lesions can extend to the mucous membranes, thus affecting the lungs, eyes, mouth, stomach, intestines and virtually every major organ.)
- Epidermolysis Bullosa (a group of blistering skin conditions. The skin is so fragile in people with EB that even minor rubbing may cause blistering. At times, the person with EB may not be aware of rubbing or injuring the skin even though blisters develop. In severe EB, blisters are not confined to the outer skin. They may develop inside the body, in such places as the linings of the mouth, esophagus, stomach, intestines, upper airway, bladder, and the genitals.)
The reported patients were engaged mostly in degreasing, i.e. cleaning metal-made products or machines, plastic toys, electronics parts (e.g. printed circuit boards, transistor components, capacitors, or computer displays), socks, ink stains in a printing shop , or unspecied material.
Skin contact with liquid TCE is not essential for the onset of the disorders (i.e. TCE vapors can cause them)
These TCE-related hypersensitivities are totally different from typical solvent toxic effects in terms of unclear dose–response relationship, period of exposure before disease onset, generalized rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and recurrence just after minimal re-exposure
Occurrences of the disorders have been reported from the USA, Japan, Spain, Singapore, China, Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines. The case reports from industrialized countries were mostly published up to 1990, whereas cases from Asian industrializing countries appeared thereafter.
--
For a copy of the full paper for research purposes, please feel free to contact us.
Saturday, June 9, 2007
Meeting Notice
View-Master Health Study Citizens Advisory Group (VMHS CAG)
Tuesday, June 12, 2007, 6:00-7:30 p.m.
Conference Room, Beaverton Library [Google map]
(SW Hall and Fifth St.)
Tentative Agenda:
1. Introductions (5 min.)
2. Approval of minutes of the April meeting. (5 min.)
3. Quick Reports (charter, letters). (10 min.)
4. Discussion with Dr. Don Austin. Dr. Austin is an M.D., an epidemiologist, and a co-investigator on the proposed View-Master health study. He will discuss with us the formation of the Oregon Cancer Registry, and talk about a few specific cancers thought to be associated with TCE. (50 min.)
5. Next meeting: September (probably Thursday, Sept. 27) (5 Min.)
Please notice that we are meeting on a Tuesday evening in order to accommodate Dr. Austin's schedule. We are meeting at 6:00, our customary time, because the library closes at 8:00.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Why not study the company-wide TCE exposures at View-Master? (OR)
- Dr. Austin to discuss TCE and cancer at View-Master Health Study Citizens Advisory Group meeting Tuesday (OR)
- Support Victims of TCE Exposure at the Punk Rock Circus (OR)...
- Report: Need for more study at View-Master (OR)
- Family sues View-Master operators in cancer death (OR)
- New community site added - View-Master/V.O.T.E. (OR)
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Friday, March 30, 2007
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.: "The people of Endicott deserve answers. I also believe that IBM should provide free and open access to the records that the researchers need."
Read the full article in the Press & Sun-Bulletin (Binghamton, NY).
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- 2nd wave of IBM TCE lawsuits filed (NY)
- "Area Seven" given all clear in Endicott TCE tests (NY)
- Updated Endicott Contamination Map...
- Vapor tests continue in Endicott and Union; Meeting Jan. 23 (NY)
- Hinchey and Clinton support Endicott study of IBM exposures + disease (NY)
- Documents available: Endicott Health Statistics Review (NY)...
- Ongoing news coverage of Endicott contamination (NY)
- Pollution fight shows inconsistencies (NY)
- IBM Monitors, EPA Ventilates (NY)
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
- Health Consultation - Health Statistics Review Follow-up (Public Comment Draft) - March 26, 2007 - NEW
- Information Sheet - Health Statistics Review Follow-up (Public Comment Draft) - March 26, 2007 - NEW
- Written Response Form - Health Statistics Review Follow-up (PDF, 11KB, 1pg.) - March 26, 2007 - NEW
What is a health statistics review?More to come...
A health statistics review uses existing health data from data sources like birth certificates and health registries to determine whether health outcomes in a particular community are occurring at higher, lower, or about the same level compared to statewide or national levels after taking into account the age, race, and sex of individuals in the community. A health statistics review does not tell us why elevations or deficits in health outcomes exist and can not prove whether there is a cause and effect relationship between exposure to chemicals and health outcomes. While a health statistics review can take risk factors commonly found on health records into account, a health statistics review may not be able to take into account certain individual risk factors for health outcomes such as medical history, genetics and occupational exposures which may explain the elevations or deficits. Rather a health statistics review can generate hypotheses and may indicate whether a more rigorous study should be considered. This health statistics review follow-up is the second major report resulting from the step-wise approach to addressing health outcome concerns related to environmental contamination in Endicott, NY.
Why was a health statistics review conducted?
A health statistics review was conducted because of concerns about possible exposures to chemicals known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Groundwater in the Endicott area is contaminated with VOCs from leaks and spills associated with local industry and commercial businesses. Trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE) are two main VOCs of concern in the area. The VOCs moved from the contaminated groundwater into air spaces in the soil and then into indoor air through cracks in foundations in some buildings, a process known as soil vapor intrusion. Because of possible health concerns, the New York State Department of Health conducted the prior health statistics review and the health statistics review follow-up.
The follow-up health statistics review gathered additional detailed information to see if known risk factors may have played a role in the higher than expected levels of health outcomes shown in the previous review. The follow-up looked at individual birth defect records, birth certificates, cancer records, and death certificates to find information about risk factors such as smoking, occupational history, family medical history, and medication use. Newspaper obituaries, Motor Vehicle records, city directories, and telephone directories were used to trace residential histories.
The follow-up also reviewed two additional birth outcomes, conotruncal heart defects (specific defects of the heart's outflow region) and stillbirths. The scientific literature suggests that both of these outcomes may be associated with TCE exposures. The follow-up also reviewed cancer incidence for all types of cancer, taking account of race. Findings from the follow-up review as well as the findings from the prior review were used to guide the development of possible options for next steps.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- 2nd wave of IBM TCE lawsuits filed (NY)
- "Area Seven" given all clear in Endicott TCE tests (NY)
- Updated Endicott Contamination Map...
- Hinchey and Clinton support Endicott study of IBM exposures + disease (NY)
- Documents available: Endicott Health Statistics Review (NY)
- Records exist to track illnesses at IBM-Endicott; $3.1 million study proposed (NY)...
- Ongoing news coverage of Endicott contamination (NY)
- Pollution fight shows inconsistencies (NY)
- IBM Monitors, EPA Ventilates (NY)
Sunday, October 8, 2006
Radioactive emissions from a 1959 nuclear accident at a research lab near Simi Valley appear to have been much greater than previously suspected and could have resulted in hundreds of cancers in surrounding communities, according to a study released Thursday.AP Reports also add:![]()
Chemical contamination from rocket engine testing at the site continues to threaten soil and groundwater in the area around Rocketdyne's Santa Susana Field Laboratory, the study also found.
The nuclear meltdown, which remained virtually unknown to the public until 1979, could have caused between 260 and 1,800 cases of cancer "over a period of many decades," the study concluded.
But the advisory panel that oversaw the five-year study, conducted by an independent team of scientists and health experts, said it could not offer more specifics about potential exposure to carcinogens because the Department of Energy and Rocketdyne's owner, Boeing Co., did not provide key information.
"This lack of candor … makes characterization of the potential health impacts of past accidents and releases extremely difficult," the panel concluded.
The lab's former owner, Rocketdyne, has said for years that no significant radiation was released. But the independent advisory panel said the incident released nearly 459 times more radiation than a similar one at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island in 1979.Read the full LA Times article, Study Says Lab Meltdown Caused Cancer. Or check out AP's report here.
[...]
The Energy Department, Boeing [the site's current owner] and the state have been involved in efforts to decontaminate the site. The state has estimated that more than 1.73 million gallons of toxic trichloroethylene was dumped on the grounds and that 500,000 gallons have saturated the bedrock beneath the lab.
The panel concluded local soil and groundwater also may have been contaminated. The rocket fuel additive perchlorate has been found in a well, but Boeing has disputed assertions it came from the lab. Long-term exposure to high levels of perchlorate can cause thyroid problems.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Prostate cancer at Rocketdyne linked to TCE exposure (CA)
- New TCE detected in Runkle Canyon near Rocketdyne/Santa Susana Field Laboratory (CA)
- Independent report: Radiation from Rocketdyne likely caused cancers (CA)
- New community site added: Clean Up Rocketdyne
- Plan for houses near Rocketdyne lab causes concern (CA)
- Boeing report: No cancer death increase linked to Rocketdyne lab (CA)
Saturday, October 7, 2006
Though the video suggests various chemicals may have been at play, the investigation has focused on exposure to TCE.
See the video here. Also be sure to visit Worked to Death for more on the P & W investigation and study.
Related Posts (on one page):
- Video: Brain cancer stalks Pratt & Whitney workers (CT)
- Annual family/public meeting - Pratt and Whitney brain tumor study (CT)
Friday, October 6, 2006
Over time, we have realized that many of our readers have a particular interest in the way TCE (or related solvents) impacts specific organs in the body — and what is known about its relationship to particular diseases. As such, we've decided to begin categorizing health effects information (articles, studies, resources, etc) by target site/organ in the body. In doing so, we've created a number of new Health Effects categories. In a few cases, we've created specific disease categories, such as Lymphomas or Leukemia.
Want to know how TCE effects the brain? Click on Health Effects - Brain. The heart? Click on Health Effects - Heart. Want to to see all posts related to all health effects? Choose Health Effects - All.
At the moment, you'll notice these categories are relatively empty. It may take us a few days or more to re-categorize all of our old health effects-related posts. In addition, as we publish new items related to specific health effects in the future, you will be able to find them in these new categories. Over time, we hope to add as many resources as possible in each category so that the TCE Blog continues to be a useful online resource.
Note: If there are resources (or categories) you would like to see added to our library of health effects information, please don't hesitate to contact us. Also, please don't hesitate to shout if you think there is a better/easier way to organize this information.
Occupational Solvents May Increase Risk of LymphomaRead the full article here. Or check out the abstract of the study, entitled "Occupational Exposure to Solvents and the Risk of Lymphomas." (the full study is available here for download with registration)
Researchers from Italy have reported that occupational exposure to solvents such as benzene, xylene, and toluene may increase the risk of developing non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The details of this case-control study were published in Epidemiology .
[...]
Many, but not all, studies show a consistent link between woodworking and Hodgkin’s disease . Trichloroethylene is an organic chemical used in dry cleaning, metal degreasing and as a solvent for oils and resins and has been identified to cause liver and kidney cancer in animals. Exposure to trichloroethylene has been associated with an increased chance of developing Hodgkin's disease and other cancers. Machinists in the metal working industry have also been reported to have a higher than average incidence of Hodgkin's disease. Exposure to pesticides has been associated with an increased incidence of Hodgkin's disease in some, but not all, clinical studies. It has also been known for some time that young adults with infectious mononucleosis are at increased risk for the development of Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Monday, October 2, 2006
Professor Runyan is a Professor with U of A's Cell Biology and Anatomy program, an Associate Research Scientist at the Univerity's Sarver Heart Center, and an Investigator for their Center for Toxicology.
We are reprinting Professor Runyan's comments here with his permission:
[T]he latest issue of Birth Defects Research part A (vol 76, 517-527) has a report by a group of investigators in South Carolina on the valve and blood vessel specific effects of TCE during cardiovascular development. This makes the third independent group to report on cardiovascular defects after the Arizona and Wisconsin groups. What is significant about the report is that it shows we are making some progress on understanding the mechanistic basis for TCE-mediated congenital heart disease and getting away from the "black box" view of teratology. As we give a molecular identity to the problem, I expect to see more investigators in this area and a reduction in the "controversy" as to whether TCE causes heart defects. Further, the developmental events targeted in the heart are likely to be relevant to cancer mechanisms as well.From the abstract of the study that Professor Runyan references:
Chick embryos exposed to trichloroethylene in an ex ovo culture model show selective defects in early endocardial cushion tissue formationThank you Professor Runyan.
Noboru Mishima 1, Stanley Hoffman 1 2, Elizabeth G. Hill 3, Edward L. Krug 1 *
1Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
2Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
3Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
BACKGROUND: Formation of the primitive heart is a critical step for establishing a competent circulatory system necessary for continued morphogenesis, and as such has significant potential as a target for environmental insult. The goal of this study was to identify the initial cellular events that precede more superficially observable abnormalities resulting from exposing early chick embryos to trichloroethylene (TCE). METHODS: A whole embryo culture method was used to assess the susceptibility of endocardial epithelial-mesenchymal transformation in the early chick heart to TCE. This method has the benefits of maintaining the anatomical relationships of developing tissues and organs, instantaneously exposing precisely staged embryos to quantifiable levels of TCE in a protein-free medium, and the ability to directly monitor developmental morphology. RESULTS: A minority of embryos (Hamburger and Hamilton [HH] stage 13-14) exposed to TCE (10-80 ppm) were not viable after 24 hr in culture and exhibited a variety of gross malformations in a dose-dependent fashion. However, the majority of treated embryos remained viable and developed into HH stage 17 embryos that were superficially indistinguishable from vehicle-treated controls. Further analysis of the hearts of these superficially normal embryos by whole-mount confocal microscopy revealed selective reduction in the number of atrioventricular canal mesenchymal cells. Additionally, those mesenchymal cells that did develop migrated abnormally as long thin cords of adherent cells. CONCLUSIONS: The regional selectivity of these effects in the chick heart suggests a critical window of susceptibility to TCE in the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of atrioventricular canal endocardium.
Note: We welcome your tips and suggestions. If there is a study, report, or news item that you think would interest TCE Blog readers and have not yet seen reported here, please let us know.
Related Posts (on one page):
- TCE and heart defects
- Does TCE cause heart defects in children?
Monday, September 25, 2006
We believe this is an important finding (and an important article) for a number of reasons:Researchers studying railroad workers have documented that cleaning solvents used in their jobs caused brain damage, shrinking the vital bridge that helps one side of the brain communicate with the other.
The results of the study by researchers from West Virginia University, the University of Pittsburgh and Johns Hopkins University, which was funded by the federal government, bolster evidence that powerful degreasers can damage the brain.
[...]
"We were able to identify a change to the structure of the brain," said lead author Marc Haut, a professor in the departments of behavioral medicine and psychiatry, neurology and radiology at the West Virginia University School of Medicine in Morgantown.
He said they found a correlation between brain loss and workers' performance on tests that evaluate such mental performance as processing speed, attention and concentration.
- Countless railroad workers across the country have been severely injured by exposure to toxins on the job. Hundreds, if not thousands, of these injured workers have filed personal injury lawsuits alleging that on-the-job solvent-exposure caused their injuries. This study helps support many of these claims.
- Though CSX spokesperson Gary Sease seems to have a copy of the polluter handbook for denying responsibility and manufacturing uncertainty, CSX has been the subject of at least one previously-published paper about TCE-exposed railroad workers entitled Building Toys and Working on the Railroad. In that paper, the author, Elle McKay, refers to the finding that "Over 600 railroaders across the southeastern United States have been diagnosed with toxic encephalopathy- a form of permanent brain damage caused by long-term exposure to toxic degreasing solvents such as TCE." She tells us:
Many railroad lines in the [southeastern U.S.], including those under CSX, used TCE as a locomotive cleanser from the 1960’s through the mid-1980’s. Diesel locomotive repairmen were the primary users of the solvent. Other workers, such as electricians, pipefitters, machinists and general laborers used TCE by the 55-gallon drum to remove oil and grease from engines and other locomotive parts. Some soaked rags directly in the drums, while others used pressurized tanks to spray the chemical. In order to clean large parts, they would be lowered into vats of heated solvent vapors. When workers got filthy maintaining and rebuilding the diesel locomotives, it wasn’t unheard of for them to wash their hands, arms, and clothing in the same solvent they used to clean the parts.
[...]
Dr. Douglas Linz, medical director for TriHealth Corporate Health Services in Cincinnati, Ohio, who has twenty years of experience treating workers exposed to industrial solvents, stated, 'The [railroad] workers clearly show the fingerprint of solvent toxicity. These individuals have…emotional or physical issues…irritability, short-term memory loss, depression. And they have neuropsychological problems: difficulties with ordered reasoning, with higher-level cognitive functioning, with memory, with following directions - Other TCE exposed populations, like the citizens in Cheshire, CT and the workers at UTC/Pratt and Whitney in CT (to name just two), have suffered from elevated rates of brain cancer. We believe the damage to the brain described above must bear some relationship to cancers suffered by these and other TCE- and solvent-exposed populations.
- Since there are literally thousands of TCE-contaminated sites across the country and, according to EPA's Walter Mugdan, "human exposures at potentially dangerous levels may have occurred for years or decades, even after a [TCE contaminated] site was recognized and (as we thought), satisfactorily addressed," we can assume that exposure to TCE may have caused and may still be causing significant brain damage to exposed children, residents, and workers across the country. Something more needs to be done to stop this.
Friday, July 28, 2006
EPA Vindicated on Deadly Widespread ContaminantRead the full story here.
Written by Mike Magner
Thursday, 27 July 2006
The National Research Council has vindicated victims of one of the Defense Department's worst environmental problems. An expert panel of NRC scientists reported that trichloroethylene, the most common water contaminant in America, is more dangerous than earlier thought.
Today's report warned that the powerful solvent is a serious public health threat that needs stronger regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency.
"We need a new drinking water standard now, with no more delays," said Jerry Ensminger, a retired Marine drill instructor whose 9-year-old daughter Janey [pictured in original article] died of leukemia in 1985 after exposure to TCE in the water at Camp Lejeune.
[...]
The question now is whether the EPA will adopt the NRC recommendations and issue a final risk assessment for TCE, the first step toward tightening the drinking water limit for the chemical.
"I am skeptical about what this administration will do with these recommendations," said retired Marine Ensminger.
He told the NRC panel last year that it made no sense that the DOD, with more than 1,400 sites tainted by TCE, was allowed by the White House to challenge EPA's risk assessment.
"Here we have the EPA that was created by the government to protect our environment and our citizens from pollution being second-guessed by the world's largest polluter, the U.S. Department of Defense!" he told the panel.
Study: Water Contaminant Can Cause CancerRead the full story here.
By JOHN HEILPRIN
The Associated Press
Thursday, July 27, 2006; 8:42 PM
WASHINGTON -- Growing scientific evidence suggests the most widespread industrial contaminant in drinking water - a solvent used in adhesives, paint and spot removers - can cause cancer in people.
The National Academy of Sciences reported Thursday that a lot more is known about the cancer risks and other health hazards from exposure to trichloroethylene than there was five years ago when the Environmental Protection Agency took steps to regulate it more strictly.
"Armed with the results from the NAS review, EPA will aggressively move forward" on a new risk assessment of TCE, spokeswoman Jennifer Wood said Thursday. "EPA will determine whether or not to address the drinking water standard once the risk assessment is complete."
Thursday, July 27, 2006
In addition you can currently download the following from the National Academies Press website:
- Full report [this link takes you to NAP webpage for full download]
- Executive Summary, 28 pages [PDF, 660K]
- Report in Brief, 4 pages [PDF, 1.4MB]
We have not had a chance to review these documents, but look forward to doing so. Once we've poured through them, we'll be back... In the meantime, if you have any thoughts you'd be willing to share on the recent report (including press coverage by the LA Times), please use the comments feature above or email us directly.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- National Academies' TCE project report available now
- LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
- UPDATED: Official release date for National Academy of Sciences report on TCE: July 27, 2006...
- Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
- EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
- National Public Meeting on TCE Health Risks
After a detailed study of the most widespread industrial contaminant in U.S. drinking water, the National Research Council will report today that evidence is growing stronger that the chemical causes cancer and other human health problems.If you recall, in 2001, EPA's Draft Health Risk Assessment for Trichloroethylene found TCE to be more toxic than previously thought and characterized TCE as "highly likely to produce cancer in humans". According to the Department of Defense, these findings were to be the basis for more stringent clean-up standards at thousands of TCE-contaminated sites across the country and were likely to cost billions of dollars for DOD, the world's largest and most powerful TCE polluter.
The 379-page report clears a path for federal regulators to formally raise the risk assessment of trichloroethylene, known as TCE, a step that has been tied up by infighting between scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency and the Defense Department.
The EPA attempted to issue a risk assessment in 2001 that found TCE to be two to 40 times more carcinogenic than previously thought, but that action was opposed by the Defense Department, the Energy Department and NASA. The Pentagon has 1,400 properties contaminated with TCE.Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) was part of the congressional briefing on Wednesday where the NAS presented their findings. In Hinchey's district, where widespread TCE contamination has impacted the air inside people's homes, a health study found that rates of kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and birth defects were elevated with statistical significance. On the Academies' report, Hinchey says:
The Bush administration sent the matter to the National Research Council for study, based on military assertions that the EPA had overblown the risks. But the new report does not support that criticism.
"The committee found that the evidence on carcinogenic risk and other health hazards from exposure to trichloroethylene has strengthened since 2001," the report said.
The report urged federal agencies to complete their assessment of TCE risks as soon as possible "with currently available data," meaning they should not wait for additional basic research, as suggested by the Defense Department.
"It is the strongest report on TCE that we have had," said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), whose district includes hundreds of homes that have air filtration systems to eliminate TCE vapors from the ground. "The fact that we have this TCE-laden drinking water used by millions of people is abominable."Reached for comment by the Times, the National Resources Defense Council's (NRDC) Gina Solomon offers:
"That is a very strong statement, a ringing endorsement of the EPA's 2001 draft risk assessment," said Solomon, an associate clinical professor of medicine at UC San Francisco and a staff scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.Jerry Ensminger has been engaged in a 9-year battle with the federal government over a community's exposure to TCE at Camp Lejeune, NC. He was reached for comment by the Times:
Solomon said the report also rejected a key position of the chemical industry and Pentagon environmental experts that TCE was not dangerous at low levels of exposure.
"We can't afford any more delays," said Jerry Ensminger, a former Marine drill sergeant who served at Camp Lejuene, where drinking water supplies were tainted. His daughter died at age 9 in 1976 from leukemia, which Ensminger blamed on TCE exposure.The report becomes available to the public at 4 pm EDT today. It will be posted to the National Academies website and linked here as soon as we can get to it. For the full LA Times story, see here.
Ensminger said he was heartened by the report's conclusions, but remained concerned about whether the government would move quickly to deal with the chemical contamination.
"I want to know why the Bush administration does not err on the side of life when it comes to the environment," he said.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- National Academies' TCE project report available now
- LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
- UPDATED: Official release date for National Academy of Sciences report on TCE: July 27, 2006...
- Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
- EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
- National Public Meeting on TCE Health Risks
"We don't completely understand combined exposure risks from multiple pathways (of TCE exposure)...Historic air exposures should be considered in the feasibility of performing an in-depth health study."[see it in context]
Friday, July 21, 2006
1970-1980. The use of TCE in the United States peaked in 1970, and thereafter began a significant decline due to a combination of several regulatory and economic factors. The 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) controlled TCE as a VOC due to its suspected contribution to ozone and smog formation. As a result, limitations on TCE emissions were placed on users in ozone nonattainment areas. TCE use was also negatively affected by the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) March 1975 finding that TCE caused cancerous tumor growths in mice livers (NCI, 1976). This finding probably influenced the EPA to include TCE on its Hazardous Substance List in 1976. As a result of NCI's finding, the General Foods Corporation announced in July 1975 that it would cease the use of TCE in the decaffeination of its Sanka2 and Brim2 brands, and would begin using methylene chloride as a substitute (C&EN, 1975a). Outright bans on TCE in states such as Rhode Island affected consumption, and led some manufacturers to promote the use of PCE and TCA as alternative solvents (Chem. Mktg. Rep., 1975). In late 1977, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the direct or indirect use of TCE in food, bringing an end to TCE's uses in hop extraction, coffee decaffeination, and spice oleoresin isolation (Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991).
In 1971, PPG Industries announced plans to triple the capacity of its Louisiana PCE/TCE production facility (C&EN, 1971). Between 1971 and 1978, the rising cost of acetylene caused a series of shutdowns of TCE plants using the acetylene production process. The shutdown of Du Pont's Niagara Falls facility, discussed in part 1 of this paper, became eective in 1972. As part of Du Pont's 1970 agreement related to the closing of the Niagara Falls plant, Diamond Shamrock adopted Du Pont's ``Triclene'' trade name for TCE (C&EN, 1970b). Hooker Chemical shut down the last acetylene-based PCE/TCE plant in 1978. The plant shutdowns led to shortages and a doubling in price between 1972 and 1976. Despite the increased prices, chemical manufacturers were reluctant to provide new capacity because of TCE's uncertain future under existing and proposed pollution control regulations (Lowenheim and Moran, 1975). The price of TCE also doubled between 1975 and 1985 (Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991). These factors combined to lead to the popularity of TCA as a TCE substitute.
Major producers of TCE as of 1974 included Dow Chemical, Ethyl Corporation, Occidental Petroleum (successor of Hooker Chemical), PPG Industries, and Diamond Shamrock (USDHHS, 1975; Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991). Together, Dow and PPG provided approximately 70% of total output (Seltzer, 1975). In the early 1970s, approximately 87% of TCE produced in the United States was used in vapor degreasing, 3% as an extraction solvent, and 8% was exported (Lowenheim and Moran, 1975). By about 1974, the percentage used in degreasing had dropped to 80%. Due largely to the growth in TCA usage, TCE's share of the vapor degreasing market dropped from 82 to 42% between 1970 and 1976 (Grayson and Eckroth, 1979).
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1980-2000)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1970-1980)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1960-1970)...
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1930-1960)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1864-1930)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history
Thursday, July 20, 2006
From: Martel, SusanThe report should be available here in one week from today. Of course, upon its release, we'll post an announcement with a link...and provide any analysis/insight that seems appropriate once we've reviewed it.
Date: Jul 20, 2006 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: Congressional briefing re: TCE report?
To: neil fischbein
Neil,
The report will be released on July 27 at 4:00 pm EDT. It will be posted to the National Academies' website at that time.
Susan
We've also received word from a source that NAS will be briefing Congress on the TCE report on Wednesday, July 26 at 2:00 pm EDT.
Update: This has recently been confirmed:
Briefing for Congressional Staff Only
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
B-308 Rayburn House Office Bldg. - 2:00 p.m.
[...]
Should you have any questions about this briefing, please contact Jim Jensen of the National Academies' Office of Congressional and Government Affairs at 202-334-1601 or email him at jjensen@nas.edu.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- National Academies' TCE project report available now
- LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
- UPDATED: Official release date for National Academy of Sciences report on TCE: July 27, 2006
- National Academy of Sciences TCE report due within weeks...
- Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
- EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
- National Public Meeting on TCE Health Risks
Sunday, July 16, 2006
1930-1940. Beginning in approximately 1930, TCE was one of the first chlorinated solvents (along with CTC) to be used in dry-cleaning as a substitute for the ammable petroleum distillates (Chem. Tr. J. Chem.Eng., 1933). TCE saw increased use in dry-cleaning of clothes as the decade progressed (Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991), and it was gaining market share from CTC in solvent applications (Thorpe and Whitely, 1938). In the mid-1930s, leading manufacturers of ferrous and non-ferrous metals began to use solvent degreasing equipment, including vapor, spray, and immersion degreasers. Stabilized forms of TCE were considered the best solvents for use in these degreasers (Davidson, 1938).
Although TCE was termed the ``ideal cleansing liquid,'' evidence of its toxicity was mounting in the early- and mid-1930s (Thomas, 1934). Major producers as of 1934 included Carbide and Carbon Chemicals, Westvaco Chlorine, and Du Pont, who acquired the Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Company and its Niagara Falls TCE facility in 1930 (United States Tariff Commission, 1934). Total United States production capacity as of the early 1930s was estimated at 15 million pounds per year (Chem. Week, 1953). The use of TCE as a general anesthetic on humans was first reported in 1935 (Striker et al., 1935).
1940-1960. By approximately 1940, TCE was reported to have replaced CTC as a solvent ``to some extent,'' due to its lack of corrosivity, ease of recovery and lower toxicity (Gabriel, 1941). TCE continued to be very widely accepted for metal degreasing, and it was reported to be rapidly replacing other solvents at this time (Byers, 1943). However, TCE's use in dry-cleaning decreased significantly when it was found to attack certain cellulose acetate dyes (Chem. Week, 1953). The net effect of these trends was that TCE's largest use in the 1940s became vapor degreasing of metals (Kirk and Othmer, 1949).
(more)
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1980-2000)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1970-1980)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1960-1970)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1930-1960)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1864-1930)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history
Saturday, July 15, 2006
History of use
E. Fischer first prepared TCE in 1864 by the reductive dehalogenation of hexachloroethane (Fischer, 1864). However, little attention was given to TCE's use as a commercial chemical product until the early 1900s. The first TCE plant reportedly became operational in 1908 in Yugoslavia (Gerhartz, 1986). Production in Germany began in 1910 (Mellan, 1957). In 1912 England's Chemical Trade Journal announced the introduction of a ``new chlorinated carbon derivative''. The new compound, TCE, was produced in two forms: one for laundries, and one for textiles and varnishes (Chem. Tr. J. Chem. Eng., 1912). One of TCE's other early uses was as an extraction agent for fats. TCE was thought to be ideal for this application because its low boiling point and narrow boiling range allowed nearly complete solvent removal from the resulting food products. However, as early as 1916, animal feeds containing soybean meal defatted with TCE were identifed as the source of cattle poisoning. Extensive losses of cattle in Europe occurred between 1923 and 1925 from ingestion of TCE-defatted soybean meal (Hu, 1971).
1920-1930. In 1921, the production of TCE via the oxidation of acetylene in the presence of a mercuric catalyst was among a number of processes referred to as a field of ``promising future development'' (United States Tari Commission, 1921). Although some sources cite 1923 or 1925 as the year when United States manufacturing of TCE began (USDHHS, 1975; Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991), the United States Census of Dyes and Synthetic Organic Chemicals indicates that Dow Chemical and the Carbide and Carbon Chemicals Corporation were manufacturing TCE as of 1921 and 1922, respectively (United States Tari Commission, 1921-22). In 1925, The Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Company (R&H), previously a major importer of TCE, began domestic production at Niagara Falls, New York (Haynes, 1948).
Despite the existence of manufacturing capacity, TCE use was not industrially signifcant until the later 1920s. Earliest applications included use in boot polishes and printing ink dryers. The demand for TCE as a degreasing solvent was stimulated later in the 1920s by improvements in the metal degreasing process. As of 1927, the food processing industry was using TCE in ``large and ever-increasing quantities'' as an extraction solvent for natural fats and palm, coconut and soybean oils (Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991; Ind. Chemist, 1927). Medical use of TCE began in approximately 1928 with the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (Oljenik, 1928).
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1980-2000)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1970-1980)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1960-1970)...
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1930-1960)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1864-1930)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history
- Uses
- History of production and major producers/manufacturers
- History of use and science/regulation
Over the course of the next few days/posts, we will feature parts of the section on history of use and regulation of TCE. For the entire article, see here.
Abstract:
Carbon tetrachloride (CTC), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) were four of the most widely used cleaning and degreasing solvents in the United States. These compounds were also used in a wide variety of other applications. The history of the production and use of these four compounds is linked to the development and growth of the United States' synthetic organic chemical industry, and historical events that affected the development and use of chlorinated solvents in general. Part 1 of this article includes a discussion of the historical background common to each of the four solvents, followed by discussion on the history of CTC and PCE. In the early years of the 20th century, CTC became the first of the four solvents to come into widespread use. CTC was used as a replacement for petroleum distillates in the dry-cleaning industry, but was later replaced by PCE. In the 1990s, CTC was phased out under the Montreal Protocol due to its role in stratospheric ozone depletion.
[...]
Part 2 of this article describes the history of TCE and TCA. TCE production in the United States began in the early 1920s. TCE was used as a replacement for petroleum distillates in the dry-cleaning industry, and became the solvent of choice for vapor degreasing in the 1930s. TCE's use as a degreaser decreased in the 1960s due to toxicity concerns and the increasing popularity of TCA. Significant TCA use began in the 1950s with the development of suitable stabilizer formulations. In the 1990s, TCA was phased out under the Montreal Protocol due to its role in stratospheric ozone depletion.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1980-2000)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1970-1980)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1960-1970)...
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1930-1960)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history of use (1864-1930)
- Trichloroethylene: Comprehensive U.S. history
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
The recently-published paper, entitled Vapor Intrusion: The Next Big Thing, is part of an online library of materials from the American Law Institute and American Bar Association's (ALI/ABA) Direct-to-Desktop CLE (continuing legal education) program. Seemingly intended for attorneys, the 12-page paper provides important information and insights for anyone learning about or dealing with vapor intrusion. It is also a must read for anyone who discounts the possibility and/or risks of vapor intrusion from groundwater contamination investigations that were conducted years ago and closed.
Topics in the paper include:
- What Is Vapor Intrusion?
- Why Does Vapor Intrusion Occur?
- Why Is Vapor Intrusion A Concern?
- What’s New About This?
- Implications Of The New Findings
- EPA Guidance
- Human Exposures
- Sampling For Vapor Intrusion
- Vapor Intrusion In The Workplace
- ...and more.
Highlights from the paper include: A full copy of the paper (all 12 pages) costs approx. $15 and can be downloaded here.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- TreeHugger: What is Vapor Intrusion?
- Strong statements about vapor intrusion
- Updating our assumptions: Vapor intrusion 101 for lawyers (and the rest of us)
- Vapor Intrusion: The New Frontier of Toxic Cleanup
-------- Original Message --------Stay tuned...
Subject: RE: When?
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 07:23:17 -0400
From: Martel, Susan
Dear Mr. Siegel:
We are estimating release in mid- to late-July. We are not planning a press release for this report.
Regards,
Susan
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- National Academies' TCE project report available now
- LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
- UPDATED: Official release date for National Academy of Sciences report on TCE: July 27, 2006
- National Academy of Sciences TCE report due within weeks
- National Academy of Sciences TCE review project
delayedextended ... - Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
- EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
- National Public Meeting on TCE Health Risks
Sunday, July 9, 2006
Lab and field tests hint that dairy whey, a lactose-rich by- product of the dairy industry, could be used to clean up underground water supplies tainted with the solvent trichloroethylene (TCE), an industrial degreaser.Read more in Red Orbit.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
We recently pointed readers to an earlier article, claiming that this amendment included health care provisions for impacted families. By way of TFTPTF, we learn from Malcolm D. Woolf, Minority Counsel to Senator James M. Jeffords, that the health care benefits provision was in a separate amendment and did NOT pass the Senate.
Meanwhile, the text of the second amendment, which DID pass and which includes study and widespread notification requirements follows:
SEC. 352. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES STUDY ON HUMAN EXPOSURE TO CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER AT CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA.
(a) STUDY REQUIRED.
(1) IN GENERAL. Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Navy shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a comprehensive review and evaluation of the available scientific and medical evidence regarding associations between pre-natal, child, and adult exposure to drinking water contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE) and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) at Camp Lejeune North Carolina, as well as other pre-natal, child, and adult exposures to levels of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene similar to those experienced at Camp Lejeune, and birth defects or diseases and any other adverse health effects.
(2) ELEMENTS. In conducting the review and evaluation, the Academy shall review ,and summarize the scientific and medical evidence and assess the strength of that evidence in establishing a link or association between exposure to trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene and each birth defect or disease suspected to be associated with such exposure. For each birth defect or disease reviewed, the Academy shall determine, to the extent practicable with available scientific and medical data, whether---
(A) a statistical association with such contaminant exposures exists; and
(B) there exist plausible biological mechanisms or other evidence of a causal relationship between contaminant exposures and the defect or disease.
(3) SCOPE OF REVIEW. In conducting the review and evaluation, the Academy shall include a review and evaluation of--
(A) the toxicologic and epidemiologic literature on adverse health effects of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene, including epidemiologic and risk assessment reports government agencies;
(B) recent literature reviews by the National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, and other groups;
(C) the completed and on-going Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry (ATSDR) studies on potential trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene exposure at Camp Lejeune; and
(D) published meta-analyses,
(4) PEER REVIEW. The Academy shall obtain the peer review of the report prepared as a result of the review and evaluation under applicable Academy procedures.
(5) SUBMITTAL The Academy shall submit the report prepared as a result of the review and evaluation to the Secretary and Congress not later than 18 months after entering into the agreement for the review and evaluation under paragraph (1).
(b) NOTICE ON EXPOSURE
(1) NOTICE REQUIRED. Upon completion of the current epidemiological study by the Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry, known as the Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water and Specific Birth Defects and Childhood Cancers, United States Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune North Carolina, the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall take appropriate actions, including the use of national media such as newspapers, television, and the Internet, to notify former Camp Lejeune residents and employees who may have been exposed to drinking water impacted by trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene of the results of the study.
(2) ELEMENTS. The information provided by the Commandant of the Marine Corps under paragraph (1) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry and shall include a description of sources of additional information relating to such exposure, including, but not be limited to, the following:
(A) A description of the events resulting in exposure to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejuene.
(B) A description of the duration and extent of the contamination of drinking water at Camp Lejeune.
(C) The known and suspected health effects of exposure to the drinking water impacted by trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene at Camp Lejeune.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- (Updated) Camp Lejeune lawsuit: What we know so far... (NC)
- Searching for affected Camp Lejeune Marines and families (MA and IA)
- 17 cases of male breast cancer among those exposed at Camp Lejeune (NC)...
- Exposed Marines want health benefits, instead get 'kicked in the teeth' (NC, MD)
- Lejeune amendment: Health care benefits? No. Study and notification? Yes. (NC, DC)
- Lejeune amendment: Not a done deal (NC, DC)...
- Limit study of Camp Lejeune, says solvents industry (NC)
- New community site added - THE STAND (NC)
- Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
A state report on the relationship between cancer cases in Lisle and Downers Grove and groundwater contamination found no significant disease clusters.
The study was the result of two separate pollution problems in areas of south Lisle and west Downers Grove.
In Lisle, hundreds of private wells were tainted with the solvent trichlorethylene, or TCE, due to spills at the Lockformer Co. plant on Ogden Avenue.
In Downers Grove, TCE and a related chemical, tetrachloroethylene, or PCE, were detected in the groundwater in several homes. The toxins came from the Ellsworth Industrial Park, authorities concluded.
Illinois Department of Public Health scientists compared countywide data with cancer cases in the neighborhoods where the wells were tested for toxins using statistics from the Illinois State Cancer Registry.
The study looks at 19,093 cancer cases reported between 1998 and 2002 in DuPage County. Fifty-three cases were found in neighborhoods with tainted wells.
Researchers concluded "no significant elevation of cancer incidence was found in the target area and no correlation was suggested between TCE or PCE contamination in well water and increase of cancer incidence." Read more here. Or download the report here.
Thursday, June 22, 2006
Dole, Jeffords' Camp Lejeune Amendment Passes Senate in DOD BillAccording to this earlier article, the amendment also extends veterans health-care benefits to children whose mothers were exposed while pregnant to the TCE and PCE-contaminated water.
WASHINGTON, DC — An amendment to support military families who were potentially exposed to highly contaminated water at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina was approved today as part of the 2007 Defense Authorization Act, which passed the Senate 96-0. The amendment was authored by Senators Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., and Jim Jeffords, I-Vt.
The amendment will help those exposed to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune Marine base, which closed the contaminated wells in 1985. The U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has found that at least 100 babies exposed in utero to the contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune suffered birth defects and cancers, including spina bifida, leukemia and cleft palates.
The Dole-Jeffords amendment requires a comprehensive National Academy of Sciences study to be completed within 18 months to evaluate the strength of the link between TCE and PCE exposure and adverse health impacts for pre-natal, childhood and adult exposures at Camp Lejeune. In 2004, Jeffords called for an investigation of the contamination, and for full notification of those affected.
The amendment also requires the Marine Corps to notify those potentially affected by the contamination so they can learn what happened, how it may have affected them, and what steps they may consider taking now to minimize the potential health impacts.
"I am hopeful that this study will provide the information these families need to answer questions that have lingered for far too long," said Jeffords, the ranking member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. "This is the minimum that our government should be doing to address the grievous failure on the part of the Marine Corps to adequately protect its service members and their families."
Congratulations to all who helped make this happen.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- (Updated) Camp Lejeune lawsuit: What we know so far... (NC)
- Searching for affected Camp Lejeune Marines and families (MA and IA)
- 17 cases of male breast cancer among those exposed at Camp Lejeune (NC)...
- Lejeune amendment: Not a done deal (NC, DC)
- Senate passes Camp Lejeune water contamination amendment (NC, DC)
- Former Camp Lejeune Marine feels abandoned (NY, NC)...
- Limit study of Camp Lejeune, says solvents industry (NC)
- New community site added - THE STAND (NC)
- Panel considers Camp Lejeune contamination study (NC)
Saturday, June 10, 2006
The document [PDF, 1.3 MB], published by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry with the state Department of Health, is an update of a study in August that found high rates of testicular and kidney cancers, birth defects of the heart and low birth weights in areas polluted with industrial solvents, including trichloroethylene (TCE). They've ruled out a number of other possible causes, but aren't yet willing to say that residential exposure to toxins has resulted in these diseases:The updated study, dated May 26 [...] took into consideration additional factors that could explain poor birth outcomes, including the mother's age, education, race, number of previous live births, and the amount of prenatal care she received. But they didn't influence the findings.It sounds to us as if the the DOH is either trying to keep expectations very low or laying the foundation for a politically palatable finding of inconclusive causation.
[...]
"It (poor birth outcomes) isn't explained by prenatal care or these other factors," said Karolina Schabses, an epidemiologist with the state Department of Health.
But there are other possibilities still being considered, mainly exposure to factory emissions or chemical gases seeping in the ground, or occupational exposure. They seem like logical suspects, but they are difficult to pin down.
"You work through the steps and you try to come to a conclusion. There is a huge realm of possibility of the things we are dealing with," Schabses said.
Come to think of it, isn't it strange that Departments of Health are so quick to emphasize the uncertainty? It almost sounds like a known and popular polluter ploy. You never see Departments of Health out there declaring "There is a cause here, dammit, and we're going to find it." Wonder why that is?
Meantime, it seems like whatever NY DOH's goal, the approach is having its intended effect:To the layman, it seems like a matter of common sense: Toxic chemicals cause illness. But waiting for years of detailed study to determine exactly who was exposed to what, at what levels, for how long and to what effect have proven frustrating for community members, said Frank Roma, a member of the Western Broome Environmental Stakeholders Coalition.
"Every time I talk to anybody, it's on people's minds," he said.
Will they ever find an answer?
"I'm hoping for it. It seems to be out of reach," he said.All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- 2nd wave of IBM TCE lawsuits filed (NY)
- "Area Seven" given all clear in Endicott TCE tests (NY)
- Updated Endicott Contamination Map...
- More Endicott, Vestal testing planned (NY)
- Other factors ruled out in Endicott cancers and birth defects (NY)
- State to Endicott: We may be in for a long ride... (NY)...
- Ongoing news coverage of Endicott contamination (NY)
- Pollution fight shows inconsistencies (NY)
- IBM Monitors, EPA Ventilates (NY)
Wednesday, May 31, 2006
NOTE: The project duration has been extended and the report is expected to be issued by summer 2006. [emphasis added]There was some expectation that a report from the NAS would be forthcoming in June, based on an initial 18 month project scope. Now it appears we'll be waiting a bit longer.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- National Academies' TCE project report available now
- LA Times on National Academies' TCE report (CA)
- UPDATED: Official release date for National Academy of Sciences report on TCE: July 27, 2006...
- National Academy of Sciences TCE report due within weeks
- National Academy of Sciences TCE review project
delayedextended - Press release: Protect people better or save polluters money?...
- Science Advisory Board (SAB) review of 2001 draft health assessment
- EPA's 2001 TCE Health Risk Assessment (External Review Draft)
- National Public Meeting on TCE Health Risks

